From: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] New syscalls to the seccomp whitelist
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:55:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50633386.9020903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348231233-29841-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 09/21/2012 08:40 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Seccomp syscall whitelist updated after tests running qemu under
> libvirt. Reference to the bug -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855162
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> qemu-seccomp.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
> index 64329a3..4712338 100644
> --- a/qemu-seccomp.c
> +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall seccomp_whitelist[] = {
> { SCMP_SYS(setsockopt), 245},
> { SCMP_SYS(uname), 245},
> { SCMP_SYS(semget), 245},
> + { SCMP_SYS(accept4), 241 },
> #endif
> { SCMP_SYS(eventfd2), 245 },
> { SCMP_SYS(dup), 245 },
> @@ -107,7 +108,25 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall seccomp_whitelist[] = {
> { SCMP_SYS(getsockname), 242 },
> { SCMP_SYS(getpeername), 242 },
> { SCMP_SYS(fdatasync), 242 },
> - { SCMP_SYS(close), 242 }
> + { SCMP_SYS(close), 242 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(unlink), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(statfs), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getuid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(ftruncate), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getegid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(geteuid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getgid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getrlimit), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(set_tid_address), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(socketpair), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(fstatfs), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(epoll_create), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(epoll_ctl), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(epoll_wait), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(pipe), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(poll), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(rt_sigpending), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(rt_sigtimedwait), 241 },
> };
>
> int seccomp_start(void)
>
If this is required for libvirt + seccomp, might be a candidate for 1.2
stable, cc'ing. At the very least we will be carrying this in Fedora 18.
- Cole
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-26 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 21:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] New syscalls to the seccomp whitelist Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-21 11:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-21 12:40 ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-24 12:36 ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-26 16:55 ` Cole Robinson [this message]
2012-09-26 20:10 ` Paul Moore
2012-09-26 15:14 ` Paul Moore
2012-09-26 16:24 ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-26 16:42 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50633386.9020903@redhat.com \
--to=crobinso@redhat.com \
--cc=otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.