From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other functions call interrupts
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:02:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5063F9FD.8050002@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120926021128.22212.20440.stgit@hpxw>
>>
>> the 3.6 kernel will closed soon. it will be great to has this patch in.
>> So, could you like to refresh your patch with popular comments format? :)
>
> Fixed patch is below.
> Thank you for the review again.
>
Peter:
Maybe the patch doesn't looks perfect for this issue.
So I am wondering if the following patch is better, if we don't care the irq_tlb
was counted again in irq_call?
===
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 613cd83..2d6d8ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
{
struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
+ inc_irq_stat(irq_tlb_count);
+
if (f->flush_mm != this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm))
return;
===
Or another solution is also reducing double counted irq_tlb_count from irq_call_count
What's your comments of this?
===
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
index d3895db..aac7886 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat);
#define __ARCH_IRQ_STAT
#define inc_irq_stat(member) this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.member)
+#define dec_irq_stat(member) this_cpu_dec(irq_stat.member)
#define local_softirq_pending() this_cpu_read(irq_stat.__softirq_pending)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 613cd83..b82bd9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
{
struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
+ /* remove double counted irq_tlb_count from irq_call_count */
+ dec_irq_stat(irq_call_count);
+ inc_irq_stat(irq_tlb_count);
+
if (f->flush_mm != this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm))
return;
===
Thanks
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-27 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50611D82.4010702@intel.com>
2012-09-26 2:11 ` [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other functions call interrupts Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-26 2:17 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-27 7:02 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2012-09-28 5:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-09-28 6:08 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-28 6:13 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-19 9:04 [PATCH] " Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-20 1:18 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-20 8:50 ` Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-21 8:08 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-24 1:37 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5063F9FD.8050002@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.