All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Ensure we set FTP_STOMP_LOW weight when WLAN is idle
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:57:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50656D77.4040101@qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOpc7mF8XTnW5gh7hnN=7e_M7f=wRVuPqT_7S9k2YN7tq4YXBw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Holger,


On Friday 28 September 2012 02:30 PM, Holger Schurig wrote:
>> We WLAN is idle we can some better bandwidth to FTP by
>> setting STOMP_LOW_FTP where stomping the FTP BT is pretty
>> much reduced when compared to setting STOMP_LOW weight.
>
> I understand that english isn't your first language (and neither is it
> mine). But this is quite unintelligible.

:) :)
apologies, I simply missed the commit log line, Its been sent as an RFC 
sometime and yesterday I sent the patch, apparently not much looking 
into the commit log :). Definitely its not correct and thanks for 
pointing this out.  Will send a v2!

>
> Beside wrong words (We/When) it doesn't also really say what is going
> on. What, for example, is FTP ?  How can you assume that this is
> generally known?  For sure it's not the file transfer protocol. Same
> with "FTP BT".

sure I would make it clear in the v2.

>
> Also, "we can some better bandwidth" misses a verb. "take into account
> of data packets" is weird, too.

sure, I will change in v2.

>
> Confused.
>

thanks a lot for your review and comments!


-- 
thanks,
shafi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	<Mohammed@venema.h4ckr.net>, <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rodriguez Luis <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Ensure we set FTP_STOMP_LOW weight when WLAN is idle
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:57:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50656D77.4040101@qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOpc7mF8XTnW5gh7hnN=7e_M7f=wRVuPqT_7S9k2YN7tq4YXBw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Holger,


On Friday 28 September 2012 02:30 PM, Holger Schurig wrote:
>> We WLAN is idle we can some better bandwidth to FTP by
>> setting STOMP_LOW_FTP where stomping the FTP BT is pretty
>> much reduced when compared to setting STOMP_LOW weight.
>
> I understand that english isn't your first language (and neither is it
> mine). But this is quite unintelligible.

:) :)
apologies, I simply missed the commit log line, Its been sent as an RFC 
sometime and yesterday I sent the patch, apparently not much looking 
into the commit log :). Definitely its not correct and thanks for 
pointing this out.  Will send a v2!

>
> Beside wrong words (We/When) it doesn't also really say what is going
> on. What, for example, is FTP ?  How can you assume that this is
> generally known?  For sure it's not the file transfer protocol. Same
> with "FTP BT".

sure I would make it clear in the v2.

>
> Also, "we can some better bandwidth" misses a verb. "take into account
> of data packets" is weird, too.

sure, I will change in v2.

>
> Confused.
>

thanks a lot for your review and comments!


-- 
thanks,
shafi



  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-28  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-27 15:12 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Ensure we set FTP_STOMP_LOW weight when WLAN is idle Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
2012-09-27 15:12 ` Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
2012-09-28  9:00 ` [ath9k-devel] " Holger Schurig
2012-09-28  9:00   ` Holger Schurig
2012-09-28  9:27   ` Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan [this message]
2012-09-28  9:27     ` Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50656D77.4040101@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.