From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] ARM: OMAP4: Add PMU Support
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:03:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5069B0B8.8080503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121001094517.GC20812@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On 10/01/2012 04:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:45:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 09/20/2012 04:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:17:02PM +0100, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>> Have queued most of these for 3.7 with the exception of the OMAP4430
>>>> CTI-related patches (which look to me like 3.8 material) and the PM
>>>> runtime suspend/resume patch (which looks to me like 3.7-rc material) --
>>>> assuming this series makes it in for 3.7 ...
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for queueing what you did.
>>>
>>> Jon -- could you pick the pieces up from what's left please and shout if
>>> you need anything from me?
>>
>> Yes will do.
>
> Great, thanks! Do you want me to do anything with my perf/omap4 branch? Now
> that we have 3.6, I can try rebasing it but I don't know if it's worth the
> effort if some of the patches are being reworked. Of course, I'm happy to
> pick newer versions if they're available.
I think that we are ok for the minute. I was going to wait until
everything gets merged for 3.7 and then rebase my branch [1] and start
re-working omap4430 support. So I would not worry right now.
Cheers
Jon
[1] https://github.com/jonhunter/linux/tree/dev-pmu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/8] ARM: OMAP4: Add PMU Support
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:03:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5069B0B8.8080503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121001094517.GC20812@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On 10/01/2012 04:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:45:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 09/20/2012 04:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:17:02PM +0100, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>> Have queued most of these for 3.7 with the exception of the OMAP4430
>>>> CTI-related patches (which look to me like 3.8 material) and the PM
>>>> runtime suspend/resume patch (which looks to me like 3.7-rc material) --
>>>> assuming this series makes it in for 3.7 ...
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for queueing what you did.
>>>
>>> Jon -- could you pick the pieces up from what's left please and shout if
>>> you need anything from me?
>>
>> Yes will do.
>
> Great, thanks! Do you want me to do anything with my perf/omap4 branch? Now
> that we have 3.6, I can try rebasing it but I don't know if it's worth the
> effort if some of the patches are being reworked. Of course, I'm happy to
> pick newer versions if they're available.
I think that we are ok for the minute. I was going to wait until
everything gets merged for 3.7 and then rebase my branch [1] and start
re-working omap4430 support. So I would not worry right now.
Cheers
Jon
[1] https://github.com/jonhunter/linux/tree/dev-pmu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-01 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 15:23 [PATCH V3 0/8] ARM: OMAP4: Add PMU Support Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 1/8] ARM: OMAP3: Add debugss HWMOD data Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-13 3:32 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-13 3:32 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-19 17:34 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-19 17:34 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:13 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:13 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-24 15:57 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-24 15:57 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 2/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PMU: Convert OMAP2/3 devices to use HWMOD Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 3/8] ARM: OMAP4: Re-map the CTIs IRQs from MPU to DEBUGSS Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-20 17:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 4/8] ARM: OMAP4430: Create PMU device via HWMOD Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-20 17:14 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:14 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 5/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PMU: Add runtime PM support Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 6/8] ARM: OMAP4: Route PMU IRQs to CTI IRQs Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-20 16:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 16:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-24 19:46 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-24 19:46 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 7/8] ARM: OMAP4: Enable PMU for OMAP4460/70 Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 8/8] ARM: OMAP2+: PMU: Add QoS constraint Jon Hunter
2012-09-10 15:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-20 17:14 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:14 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-24 16:08 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-24 16:08 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-11 6:48 ` [PATCH V3 0/8] ARM: OMAP4: Add PMU Support Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-11 6:48 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-20 17:17 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:17 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-20 17:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-20 17:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-20 17:52 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-20 17:52 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-20 21:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-09-20 21:09 ` Will Deacon
2012-09-24 21:45 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-24 21:45 ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-01 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-01 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-01 15:03 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-10-01 15:03 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-24 21:43 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-24 21:43 ` Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5069B0B8.8080503@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.