From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] ARM: davinci: da850-dm646x: remove the SRAM_VIRT iotable entry
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:23:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506D78BE.1000607@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349276133-26408-3-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com>
On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> From: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
>
> The sram regions defined for da850-dm646x in their iotable entries are also
> defined in their davinci_soc_info's.
>
> Remove this duplicate information which is now uneccessary since sram
> init will ioremap the regions defined by their davinci_soc_info's.
>
> Since this removal completely removes all uses of SRAM_VIRT, also remove
> the SRAM_VIRT definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
> Tested-by: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com>
What testing was done with this patch? Can you please add that
information to the commit text as well.
Thanks,
Sekhar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ARM: davinci: da850-dm646x: remove the SRAM_VIRT iotable entry
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:23:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506D78BE.1000607@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349276133-26408-3-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com>
On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> From: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
>
> The sram regions defined for da850-dm646x in their iotable entries are also
> defined in their davinci_soc_info's.
>
> Remove this duplicate information which is now uneccessary since sram
> init will ioremap the regions defined by their davinci_soc_info's.
>
> Since this removal completely removes all uses of SRAM_VIRT, also remove
> the SRAM_VIRT definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
> Tested-by: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com>
What testing was done with this patch? Can you please add that
information to the commit text as well.
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-04 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 14:55 [PATCH v3 0/6] uio_pruss cleanup and platform support Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: davinci: sram: ioremap the davinci_soc_info specified sram regions Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 11:48 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 11:48 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 12:49 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 12:49 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] ARM: davinci: da850-dm646x: remove the SRAM_VIRT iotable entry Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 11:53 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2012-10-04 11:53 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 12:54 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 12:54 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ARM: davinci: da850: changed SRAM allocator to shared ram Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 11:57 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 11:57 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 12:56 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 12:56 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 20:39 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 20:39 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: davinci: add platform hook to fetch the SRAM pool Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: davinci: Add support for PRUSS on DA850 Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 12:22 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 12:22 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 13:08 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 13:08 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 16:35 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 16:35 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-05 10:30 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-05 10:30 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-03 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] uio: uio_pruss: replace private SRAM API with genalloc Matt Porter
2012-10-03 14:55 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 9:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] uio_pruss cleanup and platform support Philipp Zabel
2012-10-04 9:11 ` Philipp Zabel
2012-10-04 12:42 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 12:42 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 12:54 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 12:54 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-10-04 13:10 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 13:10 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 13:35 ` Philipp Zabel
2012-10-04 13:35 ` Philipp Zabel
2012-10-04 13:54 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 13:54 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-04 14:06 ` Philipp Zabel
2012-10-04 14:06 ` Philipp Zabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506D78BE.1000607@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.