From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>
Cc: "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, "lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"axel.lin@gmail.com" <axel.lin@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:30:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50726BE0.3020904@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D958900912E20642BCBC71664EFECE3E6DDF8AF392@BGMAIL02.nvidia.com>
On Monday 08 October 2012 11:23 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laxman Dewangan
>> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 8:48 PM
>>
>> static struct platform_driver tps65090_regulator_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> - .name = "tps65090-regulator",
>> + .name = "tps65090-pmic",
> As the driver itself is regulator driver, why should we rename it to pmic?
>
I observed that other drivers are using the similar names
<chip_name>-pmic and so with inline with others.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-06 15:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:14 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 6:07 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-08 5:53 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-08 6:00 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 6:16 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: tps65090: Add support for LDO regulators Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: tps65090: Add voltage out level in platform data Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-08 5:45 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-08 5:58 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 6:21 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 7:04 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50726BE0.3020904@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=axel.lin@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vbyravarasu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.