From: jhuang0 <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic and update to 1.9.3-p194
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:46:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074D388.6060008@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LY9xi7=s0N1LX_zc9Hk3L1Wb15JRF4nN5sar8anjepJKA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/9/2012 8:38 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 11:38, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> * I sent this months ago but was told that oe-core is not the right place,
>>> however, we think it makes sense to add ruby to complete the scripting
>>> language set of: python, perl, ruby, so I re-send it.
>>
>> I have to say, my opinion is the same now as it was then. Ruby support is
>> certainly useful to have, and we have had requests for it; but unlike Perl and
>> Python which are needed by many other things, nothing we have in OE-Core
>> actually needs Ruby; thus it really belongs in another layer IMHO.
>
> Agreed. If we're completing the set of scripting languages there's
> plenty left out. A standalone meta-ruby layer that contains the
> runtime and pretty much every useful library sounds like a much better
> idea as the runtime and the libraries will be in a single place and
> incompatible changes can be done in a single move without having to
> co-ordinate multiple layers.
I see, thanks, so I think I should send it to meta-oe at this point.
Thanks,
Jackie
>
> Ross
>
--
Jackie Huang
WIND RIVER | China Development Center
MSN:jackielily@hotmail.com
Tel: +86 8477 8594
Mobile: +86 138 1027 4745
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-10 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-09 6:36 [PATCH 0/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic and update to 1.9.3-p194 jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] libyaml: Add recipe from meta-oe jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] libyaml: update to 0.1.4 jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic jackie.huang
2012-10-09 6:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] ruby: update to 1.9.3-194 jackie.huang
2012-10-09 10:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic and update to 1.9.3-p194 Paul Eggleton
2012-10-09 12:38 ` Burton, Ross
2012-10-10 1:46 ` jhuang0 [this message]
2012-10-09 17:07 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5074D388.6060008@windriver.com \
--to=jackie.huang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.