[PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau: add reservation to nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep

[PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau: add reservation to nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Apart from some code inside ttm itself and nouveau_bo_vma_del,
this is the only place where ttm_bo_wait is used without a reservation.
Fix this so we can remove the fence_lock later on.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index 5e2f521..18342b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -837,17 +837,31 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	struct drm_gem_object *gem;
 	struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
 	bool no_wait = !!(req->flags & NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP_NOWAIT);
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int ret;
+	struct nouveau_fence *fence = NULL;
 
 	gem = drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file_priv, req->handle);
 	if (!gem)
 		return -ENOENT;
 	nvbo = nouveau_gem_object(gem);
 
-	spin_lock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
-	ret = ttm_bo_wait(&nvbo->bo, true, true, no_wait);
-	spin_unlock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
+	ret = ttm_bo_reserve(&nvbo->bo, true, false, false, 0);
+	if (!ret) {
+		spin_lock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
+		ret = ttm_bo_wait(&nvbo->bo, true, true, true);
+		if (!no_wait && ret)
+			fence = nouveau_fence_ref(nvbo->bo.sync_obj);
+		spin_unlock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
+
+		ttm_bo_unreserve(&nvbo->bo);
+	}
 	drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(gem);
+
+	if (fence) {
+		ret = nouveau_fence_wait(fence, true, no_wait);
+		nouveau_fence_unref(&fence);
+	}
+
 	return ret;
 }

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau: add reservation to nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep

[Thomas Hellstrom]

So this is a typical case where a NO_WAIT can indeed become a WAIT
because of the use of a reservation instead of a spinlock.

(See the remove_fence_lock discussion)

/Thomas


On 10/12/2012 05:06 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Apart from some code inside ttm itself and nouveau_bo_vma_del,
> this is the only place where ttm_bo_wait is used without a reservation.
> Fix this so we can remove the fence_lock later on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> index 5e2f521..18342b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> @@ -837,17 +837,31 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	struct drm_gem_object *gem;
>   	struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
>   	bool no_wait = !!(req->flags & NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP_NOWAIT);
> -	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +	int ret;
> +	struct nouveau_fence *fence = NULL;
>   
>   	gem = drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file_priv, req->handle);
>   	if (!gem)
>   		return -ENOENT;
>   	nvbo = nouveau_gem_object(gem);
>   
> -	spin_lock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
> -	ret = ttm_bo_wait(&nvbo->bo, true, true, no_wait);
> -	spin_unlock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
> +	ret = ttm_bo_reserve(&nvbo->bo, true, false, false, 0);
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		spin_lock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
> +		ret = ttm_bo_wait(&nvbo->bo, true, true, true);
> +		if (!no_wait && ret)
> +			fence = nouveau_fence_ref(nvbo->bo.sync_obj);
> +		spin_unlock(&nvbo->bo.bdev->fence_lock);
> +
> +		ttm_bo_unreserve(&nvbo->bo);
> +	}
>   	drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(gem);
> +
> +	if (fence) {
> +		ret = nouveau_fence_wait(fence, true, no_wait);
> +		nouveau_fence_unref(&fence);
> +	}
> +
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel