From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>,
plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: use module_platform_driver macro
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:07:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507D15C2.7000606@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350359819-2461-2-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com>
On 10/16/2012 05:56 AM, Bo Shen :
> This patch removes some code duplication by using module_platform_driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Very good simplification but...
> ---
> drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> index 23dcb76..ac00f83 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ void ssc_free(struct ssc_device *ssc)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssc_free);
>
> -static int __init ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
Here you remove the __init altogether, maybe converting to __devinit is
the proper replacement for this? I do not know myself but if anybody knows?
Bye,
> {
> struct resource *regs;
> struct ssc_device *ssc;
> @@ -135,24 +135,14 @@ static int __devexit ssc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver ssc_driver = {
> - .remove = __devexit_p(ssc_remove),
> .driver = {
> .name = "ssc",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> },
> + .probe = ssc_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(ssc_remove),
> };
> -
> -static int __init ssc_init(void)
> -{
> - return platform_driver_probe(&ssc_driver, ssc_probe);
> -}
> -module_init(ssc_init);
> -
> -static void __exit ssc_exit(void)
> -{
> - platform_driver_unregister(&ssc_driver);
> -}
> -module_exit(ssc_exit);
> +module_platform_driver(ssc_driver);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hcegtvedt@atmel.com>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SSC driver for Atmel AVR32 and AT91");
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>,
plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: use module_platform_driver macro
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:07:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507D15C2.7000606@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350359819-2461-2-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com>
On 10/16/2012 05:56 AM, Bo Shen :
> This patch removes some code duplication by using module_platform_driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Very good simplification but...
> ---
> drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> index 23dcb76..ac00f83 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ void ssc_free(struct ssc_device *ssc)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssc_free);
>
> -static int __init ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
Here you remove the __init altogether, maybe converting to __devinit is
the proper replacement for this? I do not know myself but if anybody knows?
Bye,
> {
> struct resource *regs;
> struct ssc_device *ssc;
> @@ -135,24 +135,14 @@ static int __devexit ssc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver ssc_driver = {
> - .remove = __devexit_p(ssc_remove),
> .driver = {
> .name = "ssc",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> },
> + .probe = ssc_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(ssc_remove),
> };
> -
> -static int __init ssc_init(void)
> -{
> - return platform_driver_probe(&ssc_driver, ssc_probe);
> -}
> -module_init(ssc_init);
> -
> -static void __exit ssc_exit(void)
> -{
> - platform_driver_unregister(&ssc_driver);
> -}
> -module_exit(ssc_exit);
> +module_platform_driver(ssc_driver);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hcegtvedt@atmel.com>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SSC driver for Atmel AVR32 and AT91");
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: use module_platform_driver macro
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:07:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507D15C2.7000606@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350359819-2461-2-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com>
On 10/16/2012 05:56 AM, Bo Shen :
> This patch removes some code duplication by using module_platform_driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Very good simplification but...
> ---
> drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> index 23dcb76..ac00f83 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ void ssc_free(struct ssc_device *ssc)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssc_free);
>
> -static int __init ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
Here you remove the __init altogether, maybe converting to __devinit is
the proper replacement for this? I do not know myself but if anybody knows?
Bye,
> {
> struct resource *regs;
> struct ssc_device *ssc;
> @@ -135,24 +135,14 @@ static int __devexit ssc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver ssc_driver = {
> - .remove = __devexit_p(ssc_remove),
> .driver = {
> .name = "ssc",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> },
> + .probe = ssc_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(ssc_remove),
> };
> -
> -static int __init ssc_init(void)
> -{
> - return platform_driver_probe(&ssc_driver, ssc_probe);
> -}
> -module_init(ssc_init);
> -
> -static void __exit ssc_exit(void)
> -{
> - platform_driver_unregister(&ssc_driver);
> -}
> -module_exit(ssc_exit);
> +module_platform_driver(ssc_driver);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hcegtvedt@atmel.com>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SSC driver for Atmel AVR32 and AT91");
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 3:56 [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: use devm_xxx() managed function Bo Shen
2012-10-16 3:56 ` Bo Shen
2012-10-16 3:56 ` Bo Shen
2012-10-16 3:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: use module_platform_driver macro Bo Shen
2012-10-16 3:56 ` Bo Shen
2012-10-16 3:56 ` Bo Shen
2012-10-16 8:07 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2012-10-16 8:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-10-16 8:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-10-16 8:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-16 8:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-16 8:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-16 8:59 ` Bo Shen
2012-10-16 8:59 ` Bo Shen
2012-10-16 8:59 ` Bo Shen
2012-10-16 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-16 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-16 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-16 9:32 ` Fabio Porcedda
2012-10-16 9:32 ` Fabio Porcedda
2012-10-16 9:32 ` Fabio Porcedda
2012-10-16 5:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: use devm_xxx() managed function Mark Brown
2012-10-16 5:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-16 5:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-16 8:05 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-10-16 8:05 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-10-16 8:05 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507D15C2.7000606@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=voice.shen@atmel.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.