From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"stefan.bader@canonical.com" <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen PVM: Strange lockups when running PostgreSQL load
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:12:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507ECAF8.7050709@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507EE22602000078000A20DB@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 17/10/12 15:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 17.10.12 at 15:28, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> In our case, certain processes were locking up, and it turned out that
>> the kernel was issuing SCHOP_poll hypercalls (same the stack trace on
>> your launchpad ticket) on its own spinlock IPI event channel
>> (understandable, as its a spinlock), but with the event channel masked,
>> so it would never wake up from the poll.
> Probably some misunderstanding: The event channel used
> here will always be masked, and whether an event channel is
> masked doesn't matter for the purposes of polling it.
>
> Jan
>
Sorry - I was not very clear.
In our case, we saw every single VCPU stuck in a SCHEDOP_poll on its own
spinlock event channel, which renderes the guest completely deadlocked.
My understanding was that while some VCPUs were blocked in the
hypervisor, the VCPU with the lock should raise an event when the lock
was released, waking the other VCPUs so one could grab the lock. This
implication of this being that there is a bug in the spinlock code.
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-17 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-17 13:10 Xen PVM: Strange lockups when running PostgreSQL load Stefan Bader
2012-10-17 13:28 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-10-17 13:45 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-17 13:55 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-17 15:21 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-17 15:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-10-17 16:27 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-17 17:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-10-18 7:00 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-18 7:08 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-18 7:38 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-18 7:48 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-18 10:20 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-18 10:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-18 12:43 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-18 20:52 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-19 7:10 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-19 8:06 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-19 8:33 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-19 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-19 14:03 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-19 14:49 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-19 14:57 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-19 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-19 15:21 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-19 15:33 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-18 7:24 ` Stefan Bader
2012-10-17 14:51 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-17 15:12 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507ECAF8.7050709@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.