All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:06:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507F803A.8000900@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210171428540.20712@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

(2012/10/18 6:31), David Rientjes wrote:
> As a result of commit 32f8516a8c73 ("mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack
> contents in numa_maps"), the mutex protecting a shared policy can be
> inadvertently taken while holding task_lock(task).
>
> Recently, commit b22d127a39dd ("mempolicy: fix a race in
> shared_policy_replace()") switched the spinlock within a shared policy to
> a mutex so sp_alloc() could block.  Thus, a refcount must be grabbed on
> all mempolicies returned by get_vma_policy() so it isn't freed while being
> passed to mpol_to_str() when reading /proc/pid/numa_maps.
>
> This patch only takes task_lock() while dereferencing task->mempolicy in
> get_vma_policy() if it's non-NULL in the lockess check to increment its
> refcount.  This ensures it will remain in memory until dropped by
> __mpol_put() after mpol_to_str() is called.
>
> Refcounts of shared policies are grabbed by the ->get_policy() function of
> the vma, all others will be grabbed directly in get_vma_policy().  Now
> that this is done, all callers now unconditionally drop the refcount.
>

please add original problem description....

from your 1st patch.
> When reading /proc/pid/numa_maps, it's possible to return the contents of
> the stack where the mempolicy string should be printed if the policy gets
> freed from beneath us.
>
> This happens because mpol_to_str() may return an error the
> stack-allocated buffer is then printed without ever being stored.
.....

Hmm, I've read the whole thread again...and, I'm sorry if I misunderstand something.

I think Kosaki mentioned the commit 52cd3b0740. It avoids refcounting in get_vma_policy()
because it's called every time alloc_pages_vma() is called, at every page fault.
So, it seems he doesn't agree this fix because of performance concern on big NUMA,


Can't we have another way to fix ? like this ? too ugly ?
Again, I'm sorry if I misunderstand the points.

==

 From bfe7e2ab1c1375b134ec12efce6517149318f75d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:17:25 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] hold task->mempolicy while numa_maps scans.

  /proc/<pid>/numa_maps scans vma and show mempolicy under
  mmap_sem. It sometimes accesses task->mempolicy which can
  be freed without mmap_sem and numa_maps can show some
  garbage while scanning.

This patch tries to take reference count of task->mempolicy at reading
numa_maps before calling get_vma_policy(). By this, task->mempolicy
will not be freed until numa_maps reaches its end.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  fs/proc/task_mmu.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 14df880..d92e868 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static void vma_stop(struct proc_maps_private *priv, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  {
  	if (vma && vma != priv->tail_vma) {
  		struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+		task_lock(priv->task);
+		__mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
+		task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  		mmput(mm);
  	}
@@ -130,6 +135,16 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
  		return mm;
  	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  
+	/*
+	 * task->mempolicy can be freed even if mmap_sem is down (see kernel/exit.c)
+	 * We grab refcount for stable access.
+	 * repleacement of task->mmpolicy is guarded by mmap_sem.
+	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	task_lock(priv->task);
+	mpol_get(priv->task->mempolicy);
+	task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  	tail_vma = get_gate_vma(priv->task->mm);
  	priv->tail_vma = tail_vma;
  
@@ -161,6 +176,11 @@ out:
  
  	/* End of vmas has been reached */
  	m->version = (tail_vma != NULL)? 0: -1UL;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	task_lock(priv->task);
+	__mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
+	task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  	mmput(mm);
  	return tail_vma;
-- 
1.7.10.2













--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:06:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507F803A.8000900@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210171428540.20712@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

(2012/10/18 6:31), David Rientjes wrote:
> As a result of commit 32f8516a8c73 ("mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack
> contents in numa_maps"), the mutex protecting a shared policy can be
> inadvertently taken while holding task_lock(task).
>
> Recently, commit b22d127a39dd ("mempolicy: fix a race in
> shared_policy_replace()") switched the spinlock within a shared policy to
> a mutex so sp_alloc() could block.  Thus, a refcount must be grabbed on
> all mempolicies returned by get_vma_policy() so it isn't freed while being
> passed to mpol_to_str() when reading /proc/pid/numa_maps.
>
> This patch only takes task_lock() while dereferencing task->mempolicy in
> get_vma_policy() if it's non-NULL in the lockess check to increment its
> refcount.  This ensures it will remain in memory until dropped by
> __mpol_put() after mpol_to_str() is called.
>
> Refcounts of shared policies are grabbed by the ->get_policy() function of
> the vma, all others will be grabbed directly in get_vma_policy().  Now
> that this is done, all callers now unconditionally drop the refcount.
>

please add original problem description....

from your 1st patch.
> When reading /proc/pid/numa_maps, it's possible to return the contents of
> the stack where the mempolicy string should be printed if the policy gets
> freed from beneath us.
>
> This happens because mpol_to_str() may return an error the
> stack-allocated buffer is then printed without ever being stored.
.....

Hmm, I've read the whole thread again...and, I'm sorry if I misunderstand something.

I think Kosaki mentioned the commit 52cd3b0740. It avoids refcounting in get_vma_policy()
because it's called every time alloc_pages_vma() is called, at every page fault.
So, it seems he doesn't agree this fix because of performance concern on big NUMA,


Can't we have another way to fix ? like this ? too ugly ?
Again, I'm sorry if I misunderstand the points.

==

 From bfe7e2ab1c1375b134ec12efce6517149318f75d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:17:25 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] hold task->mempolicy while numa_maps scans.

  /proc/<pid>/numa_maps scans vma and show mempolicy under
  mmap_sem. It sometimes accesses task->mempolicy which can
  be freed without mmap_sem and numa_maps can show some
  garbage while scanning.

This patch tries to take reference count of task->mempolicy at reading
numa_maps before calling get_vma_policy(). By this, task->mempolicy
will not be freed until numa_maps reaches its end.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  fs/proc/task_mmu.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 14df880..d92e868 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static void vma_stop(struct proc_maps_private *priv, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  {
  	if (vma && vma != priv->tail_vma) {
  		struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+		task_lock(priv->task);
+		__mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
+		task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  		mmput(mm);
  	}
@@ -130,6 +135,16 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
  		return mm;
  	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  
+	/*
+	 * task->mempolicy can be freed even if mmap_sem is down (see kernel/exit.c)
+	 * We grab refcount for stable access.
+	 * repleacement of task->mmpolicy is guarded by mmap_sem.
+	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	task_lock(priv->task);
+	mpol_get(priv->task->mempolicy);
+	task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  	tail_vma = get_gate_vma(priv->task->mm);
  	priv->tail_vma = tail_vma;
  
@@ -161,6 +176,11 @@ out:
  
  	/* End of vmas has been reached */
  	m->version = (tail_vma != NULL)? 0: -1UL;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	task_lock(priv->task);
+	__mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
+	task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  	mmput(mm);
  	return tail_vma;
-- 
1.7.10.2














  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08 15:09 mpol_to_str revisited Dave Jones
2012-10-08 15:09 ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08 15:15 ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08 15:15   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08 20:46   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:46     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:35 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:35   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:52   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08 20:52     ` Dave Jones
2012-10-16  0:48     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16  0:48       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09  0:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-16  2:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  2:34   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  3:58   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16  3:58     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16  5:10     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  5:10       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  6:10       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16  6:10         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16 23:39         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16 23:39           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  0:12           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  0:12             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  0:31             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17  0:31               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:38               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  1:38                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  1:49                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:49                   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:53                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  1:53                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  4:05               ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17  4:05                 ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17  5:24                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  5:24                   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  5:42                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-17  5:42                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-17  8:49                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  8:49                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 19:50                       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:50                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:05                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 21:05                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 21:27                           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:27                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 18:14                   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 18:14                     ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:21                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:21                       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:32                       ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:32                         ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:38                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:38                           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:45                           ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:45                             ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 20:28                             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17 20:28                               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:31                               ` [patch for-3.7 v2] " David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:31                                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18  4:06                                 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-10-18  4:06                                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:14                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-18  4:14                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-18  4:41                                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:41                                       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:34                                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:34                                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18 20:03                                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18 20:03                                       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19  8:35                                       ` [patch for-3.7 v3] mm, mempolicy: hold task->mempolicy refcount while " Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-19  8:35                                         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-19  9:28                                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19  9:28                                           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-22  2:47                                           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-22  2:47                                             ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-22 20:55                                             ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-22 20:55                                               ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-22 20:56                                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-22 20:56                                               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19 19:15                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19 19:15                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19  6:51                                     ` [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when " KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19  6:51                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-18  4:35                                   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18  4:35                                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:30                   ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps Sasha Levin
2012-10-24 23:30                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-24 23:34                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:34                       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:37                       ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-24 23:37                         ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25  0:08                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25  0:08                           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25  0:54                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25  0:54                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25  1:15                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25  1:15                               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 12:19                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 12:19                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 14:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 14:39                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 17:23                               ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25 17:23                                 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25 20:22                               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 20:22                                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 23:09                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-25 23:09                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-26  8:48                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-26  8:48                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-31 18:29                                   ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-31 18:29                                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-21  0:59                                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-21  0:59                                       ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-17  1:33             ` mpol_to_str revisited KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  1:33               ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507F803A.8000900@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.