All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on disable
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:08:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5087FD7C.1000006@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pq4854wu.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

On Wednesday 24 October 2012 07:49 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Kevin Hilman
>> <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
>>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>>
>>> When debounce clocks are disabled, ensure that the banks
>>> dbck_enable_mask is cleared also.  Otherwise, context restore on
>>> subsequent off-mode transition will restore previous value from the
>>> shadow copies (bank->context.debounce*) leading to mismatch state
>>> between driver state and hardware state.
>>
>> This doesn't look right to me, aren't you effectively disabling
>> debounce forever here? _gpio_dbck_disable is called from
>> omap_gpio_runtime_suspend() and nothing will ever restore
>> dbck_enable_mask back to what it was set by _set_gpio_debounce and
>> debounce functionality is lost.
>
> Yes, you're right.   Good catch.
>
> I need a fix that's more targetted to the free/reset path.
>
Right. Just clearing the debounce mask in omap_gpio_free()
should do the trick.

Regards
Santosh


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on disable
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:08:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5087FD7C.1000006@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pq4854wu.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

On Wednesday 24 October 2012 07:49 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Kevin Hilman
>> <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
>>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>>
>>> When debounce clocks are disabled, ensure that the banks
>>> dbck_enable_mask is cleared also.  Otherwise, context restore on
>>> subsequent off-mode transition will restore previous value from the
>>> shadow copies (bank->context.debounce*) leading to mismatch state
>>> between driver state and hardware state.
>>
>> This doesn't look right to me, aren't you effectively disabling
>> debounce forever here? _gpio_dbck_disable is called from
>> omap_gpio_runtime_suspend() and nothing will ever restore
>> dbck_enable_mask back to what it was set by _set_gpio_debounce and
>> debounce functionality is lost.
>
> Yes, you're right.   Good catch.
>
> I need a fix that's more targetted to the free/reset path.
>
Right. Just clearing the debounce mask in omap_gpio_free()
should do the trick.

Regards
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-23 18:09 [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on disable Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 18:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 19:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-23 19:09   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-23 22:00   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 22:00     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-24  7:39     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-24  7:39       ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-24  7:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24  7:33   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24  8:16 ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-24  8:16   ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-24  8:56   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-10-24  8:56     ` Igor Grinberg
2012-10-24 12:02 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-10-24 12:02   ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-10-24 12:49   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 12:49     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 13:40     ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-10-24 13:40       ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-10-24 14:19   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-24 14:19     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-24 14:38     ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2012-10-24 14:38       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-26  7:21     ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-26  7:21       ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5087FD7C.1000006@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=notasas@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.