All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 2/6] sched: add a new SD SHARE_POWERLINE flag for sched_domain
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:47:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5088066D.7000907@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349595838-31274-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Vincent,

Few comments/questions.

On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This new flag SD SHARE_POWERLINE reflects the sharing of the power rail
> between the members of a domain. As this is the current assumption of the
> scheduler, the flag is added to all sched_domain
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h |    1 +
>   arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h |    1 +
>   include/linux/sched.h            |    1 +
>   include/linux/topology.h         |    3 +++
>   kernel/sched/core.c              |    5 +++++
>   5 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
> index a2496e4..065c720 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ void build_cpu_to_node_map(void);
>   				| SD_BALANCE_EXEC	\
>   				| SD_BALANCE_FORK	\
>   				| SD_WAKE_AFFINE,	\
> +				| arch_sd_share_power_line()		\
>   	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
>   	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
>   	.nr_balance_failed	= 0,			\
> diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
> index 7a7ce39..d39ed0b 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>   				| 0*SD_PREFER_LOCAL			\
>   				| 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER			\
>   				| 0*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES		\
> +				| arch_sd_share_power_line()		\
>   				| 0*SD_SERIALIZE			\
>   				,					\
>   	.last_balance		= jiffies,				\
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 4786b20..74f2daf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -862,6 +862,7 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
>   #define SD_WAKE_AFFINE		0x0020	/* Wake task to waking CPU */
>   #define SD_PREFER_LOCAL		0x0040  /* Prefer to keep tasks local to this domain */
>   #define SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER	0x0080	/* Domain members share cpu power */
> +#define SD_SHARE_POWERLINE	0x0100	/* Domain members share power domain */
If you ignore the current use of SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER, isn't the meaning of
CPUPOWER and POWERLINE is same here. Just trying to understand the clear
meaning of this new flag. Have you not considered SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER
because it is being used for cpu_power and needs at least minimum two
domains ? SD_PACKING would have been probably more appropriate based
on the way it is being used in further series.

Regards
Santosh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <pjt@google.com>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/6] sched: add a new SD SHARE_POWERLINE flag for sched_domain
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:47:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5088066D.7000907@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349595838-31274-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Vincent,

Few comments/questions.

On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This new flag SD SHARE_POWERLINE reflects the sharing of the power rail
> between the members of a domain. As this is the current assumption of the
> scheduler, the flag is added to all sched_domain
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h |    1 +
>   arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h |    1 +
>   include/linux/sched.h            |    1 +
>   include/linux/topology.h         |    3 +++
>   kernel/sched/core.c              |    5 +++++
>   5 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
> index a2496e4..065c720 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ void build_cpu_to_node_map(void);
>   				| SD_BALANCE_EXEC	\
>   				| SD_BALANCE_FORK	\
>   				| SD_WAKE_AFFINE,	\
> +				| arch_sd_share_power_line()		\
>   	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
>   	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
>   	.nr_balance_failed	= 0,			\
> diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
> index 7a7ce39..d39ed0b 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>   				| 0*SD_PREFER_LOCAL			\
>   				| 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER			\
>   				| 0*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES		\
> +				| arch_sd_share_power_line()		\
>   				| 0*SD_SERIALIZE			\
>   				,					\
>   	.last_balance		= jiffies,				\
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 4786b20..74f2daf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -862,6 +862,7 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
>   #define SD_WAKE_AFFINE		0x0020	/* Wake task to waking CPU */
>   #define SD_PREFER_LOCAL		0x0040  /* Prefer to keep tasks local to this domain */
>   #define SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER	0x0080	/* Domain members share cpu power */
> +#define SD_SHARE_POWERLINE	0x0100	/* Domain members share power domain */
If you ignore the current use of SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER, isn't the meaning of
CPUPOWER and POWERLINE is same here. Just trying to understand the clear
meaning of this new flag. Have you not considered SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER
because it is being used for cpu_power and needs at least minimum two
domains ? SD_PACKING would have been probably more appropriate based
on the way it is being used in further series.

Regards
Santosh


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-07  7:43 [RFC 0/6] sched: packing small tasks Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43 ` [RFC 1/6] Revert "sched: introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43 ` [RFC 2/6] sched: add a new SD SHARE_POWERLINE flag for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:17   ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2012-10-24 15:17     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29  9:40     ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29  9:40       ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29  9:50       ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29  9:50         ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 10:27         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-02 10:27           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-07  7:43 ` [RFC 3/6] sched: pack small tasks Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:20   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 15:20     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 13:12     ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29 13:12       ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 10:53       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-02 10:53         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-09 16:46         ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-09 16:46           ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-12 13:13           ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-12 13:13             ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-12  9:30         ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-12  9:30           ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-09 17:13   ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-09 17:13     ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-12 13:51     ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-12 13:51       ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-20 14:28       ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-20 14:28         ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-20 16:59         ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-20 16:59           ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43 ` [RFC 4/6] sched: secure access to other CPU statistics Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:21   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 15:21     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 13:18     ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29 13:18       ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43 ` [RFC 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:21   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 15:21     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 13:27     ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29 13:27       ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 10:59       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-02 10:59         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-07  7:43 ` [RFC 6/6] ARM: sched: clear SD_SHARE_POWERLINE Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07  7:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:21   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 15:21     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 13:28     ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29 13:28       ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 11:00       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-02 11:00         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-12  8:23         ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-12  8:23           ` Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5088066D.7000907@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.