All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on free/reset
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:30:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5088E387.2050704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50887197.8010104@ti.com>

On Thursday 25 October 2012 04:24 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 10/24/2012 12:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>
>> When a GPIO bank is freed or shutdown, ensure that the banks
>> dbck_enable_mask is cleared also.  Otherwise, context restore on
>> subsequent off-mode transition will restore previous value from the
>> shadow copies (bank->context.debounce*) leading to mismatch state
>> between driver state and hardware state.
>>
>> This was discovered when board code was doing
>>
>>    gpio_request_one()
>>    gpio_set_debounce()
>>    gpio_free()
>>
>> which was leaving the GPIO debounce settings in a confused state.  If
>> that GPIO bank is subsequently used with off-mode enabled, bogus state
>> would be restored, leaving GPIO debounce enabled which then prevented
>> the CORE powerdomain from transitioning.
>>
>> To fix, ensure that bank->dbck_enable_mask is cleared when the bank
>> is freed/shutdown so debounce state doesn't persist.
>>
The freed part is fine but I don't understand why it needs to be done
on _a_ gpio irq shutdown callback where IRQs related configuration
on that one GPIO needs to be cleared. De-bounce clock is surely not IRQ
related configuration.

>> Special thanks to Grazvydas Ignotas for pointing out a bug in an
>> earlier version that would've disabled debounce on any runtime PM
>> transition.
>>
>> Reported-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> Cc: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v2: only clear mask in free/shutdown, not in runtime PM paths,
>>      clarified changelog
>> Applies on v3.7-rc2.
>>
>>   drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> index 94cbc84..113b167 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> @@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ static void _reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)
>>   	_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 0);
>>   	_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
>>   	_set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>> +	bank->dbck_enable_mask = 0;
>>   }
>
> Does this need to be ...
>
> +	bank->dbck_enable_mask &= ~(GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio));
> +	_gpio_dbck_disable(bank);
>
Yes, its a per bank clock. There is an alternate. See below.

> There could be more than one gpio using debounce and so we should only
> clear the appropriate bit. Also after clearing a bit we could see if we
> can disable the debounce clock too.
>
When I mentioned the clearing in gpio_free() path will do trick, I had
something like below in mind.

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index dee2856..8574105 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -629,8 +629,10 @@ static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, 
unsigned offset)
  	 * If this is the last gpio to be freed in the bank,
  	 * disable the bank module.
  	 */
-	if (!bank->mod_usage)
+	if (!bank->mod_usage) {
+		bank->dbck_enable_mask = 0;
  		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
+	}
  }

  /*

This patch should be enough according to me unless and until I am
missing mask clear need in irq_shutdown path. It will also take
care of disabling of debounce clock as part of runtime suspend callback.

Regards,
Santosh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on free/reset
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:30:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5088E387.2050704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50887197.8010104@ti.com>

On Thursday 25 October 2012 04:24 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 10/24/2012 12:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>
>> When a GPIO bank is freed or shutdown, ensure that the banks
>> dbck_enable_mask is cleared also.  Otherwise, context restore on
>> subsequent off-mode transition will restore previous value from the
>> shadow copies (bank->context.debounce*) leading to mismatch state
>> between driver state and hardware state.
>>
>> This was discovered when board code was doing
>>
>>    gpio_request_one()
>>    gpio_set_debounce()
>>    gpio_free()
>>
>> which was leaving the GPIO debounce settings in a confused state.  If
>> that GPIO bank is subsequently used with off-mode enabled, bogus state
>> would be restored, leaving GPIO debounce enabled which then prevented
>> the CORE powerdomain from transitioning.
>>
>> To fix, ensure that bank->dbck_enable_mask is cleared when the bank
>> is freed/shutdown so debounce state doesn't persist.
>>
The freed part is fine but I don't understand why it needs to be done
on _a_ gpio irq shutdown callback where IRQs related configuration
on that one GPIO needs to be cleared. De-bounce clock is surely not IRQ
related configuration.

>> Special thanks to Grazvydas Ignotas for pointing out a bug in an
>> earlier version that would've disabled debounce on any runtime PM
>> transition.
>>
>> Reported-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> Cc: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v2: only clear mask in free/shutdown, not in runtime PM paths,
>>      clarified changelog
>> Applies on v3.7-rc2.
>>
>>   drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> index 94cbc84..113b167 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> @@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ static void _reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)
>>   	_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 0);
>>   	_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
>>   	_set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>> +	bank->dbck_enable_mask = 0;
>>   }
>
> Does this need to be ...
>
> +	bank->dbck_enable_mask &= ~(GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio));
> +	_gpio_dbck_disable(bank);
>
Yes, its a per bank clock. There is an alternate. See below.

> There could be more than one gpio using debounce and so we should only
> clear the appropriate bit. Also after clearing a bit we could see if we
> can disable the debounce clock too.
>
When I mentioned the clearing in gpio_free() path will do trick, I had
something like below in mind.

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index dee2856..8574105 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -629,8 +629,10 @@ static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, 
unsigned offset)
  	 * If this is the last gpio to be freed in the bank,
  	 * disable the bank module.
  	 */
-	if (!bank->mod_usage)
+	if (!bank->mod_usage) {
+		bank->dbck_enable_mask = 0;
  		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
+	}
  }

  /*

This patch should be enough according to me unless and until I am
missing mask clear need in irq_shutdown path. It will also take
care of disabling of debounce clock as part of runtime suspend callback.

Regards,
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-25  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24 17:10 [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on free/reset Kevin Hilman
2012-10-24 17:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-24 22:54 ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-24 22:54   ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-25  7:00   ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2012-10-25  7:00     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-25 13:11     ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-25 13:11       ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-25 13:19       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-25 13:19         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-25 16:30       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-25 16:30         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-25 16:49         ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-25 16:49           ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-25 16:26   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-25 16:26     ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5088E387.2050704@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=notasas@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.