From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: make ordered operations be handled by multi-task
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:31:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508906D7.2090402@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5089045D.8050801@cn.fujitsu.com>
The process of the ordered operations is similar to the delalloc inode flush, so
we handle them by flush workers.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index 7772f02..ab2a3c0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -519,13 +519,17 @@ void btrfs_wait_ordered_extents(struct btrfs_root *root, int delay_iput)
* extra check to make sure the ordered operation list really is empty
* before we return
*/
-void btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait)
+int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait)
{
struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode;
struct inode *inode;
struct list_head splice;
+ struct list_head works;
+ struct btrfs_delalloc_work *work, *next;
+ int ret = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&splice);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&works);
mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_operations_mutex);
spin_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
@@ -533,6 +537,7 @@ again:
list_splice_init(&root->fs_info->ordered_operations, &splice);
while (!list_empty(&splice)) {
+
btrfs_inode = list_entry(splice.next, struct btrfs_inode,
ordered_operations);
@@ -549,15 +554,26 @@ again:
list_add_tail(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations,
&root->fs_info->ordered_operations);
}
+
+ if (!inode)
+ continue;
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
- if (inode) {
- if (wait)
- btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
- else
- filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
- btrfs_add_delayed_iput(inode);
+ work = btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work(inode, wait, 1);
+ if (!work) {
+ if (list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations))
+ list_add_tail(&btrfs_inode->ordered_operations,
+ &splice);
+ spin_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
+ list_splice_tail(&splice,
+ &root->fs_info->ordered_operations);
+ spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
}
+ list_add_tail(&work->list, &works);
+ btrfs_queue_worker(&root->fs_info->flush_workers,
+ &work->work);
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
@@ -566,7 +582,13 @@ again:
goto again;
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
+out:
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(work, next, &works, list) {
+ list_del_init(&work->list);
+ btrfs_wait_and_free_delalloc_work(work);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_operations_mutex);
+ return ret;
}
/*
@@ -934,15 +956,6 @@ void btrfs_add_ordered_operation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (last_mod < root->fs_info->last_trans_committed)
return;
- /*
- * the transaction is already committing. Just start the IO and
- * don't bother with all of this list nonsense
- */
- if (trans && root->fs_info->running_transaction->blocked) {
- btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
- return;
- }
-
spin_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
if (list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations)) {
list_add_tail(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations,
@@ -959,6 +972,7 @@ int __init ordered_data_init(void)
NULL);
if (!btrfs_ordered_extent_cache)
return -ENOMEM;
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
index dd27a0b..e8dcec6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(struct inode *inode,
int btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(struct inode *inode, u64 offset,
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered);
int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 disk_bytenr, u32 *sum);
-void btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait);
+int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait);
void btrfs_add_ordered_operation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct inode *inode);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 4aed529..621790e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -1414,15 +1414,21 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
struct btrfs_transaction *prev_trans = NULL;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
- int ret = -EIO;
+ int ret;
int should_grow = 0;
unsigned long now = get_seconds();
int flush_on_commit = btrfs_test_opt(root, FLUSHONCOMMIT);
- btrfs_run_ordered_operations(root, 0);
+ ret = btrfs_run_ordered_operations(root, 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
+ goto cleanup_transaction;
+ }
- if (cur_trans->aborted)
+ if (cur_trans->aborted) {
+ ret = cur_trans->aborted;
goto cleanup_transaction;
+ }
/* make a pass through all the delayed refs we have so far
* any runnings procs may add more while we are here
@@ -1525,7 +1531,11 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
* it here and no for sure that nothing new will be added
* to the list
*/
- btrfs_run_ordered_operations(root, 1);
+ ret = btrfs_run_ordered_operations(root, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
+ goto cleanup_transaction;
+ }
prepare_to_wait(&cur_trans->writer_wait, &wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
--
1.6.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 9:20 [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc by multi-task Miao Xie
2012-10-25 9:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] Btrfs: make delalloc inodes be flushed " Miao Xie
2012-10-25 9:31 ` Miao Xie [this message]
2012-10-25 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] Btrfs: make ordered extent " Miao Xie
2012-10-25 11:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc " Liu Bo
2012-10-26 1:56 ` Miao Xie
2012-10-26 2:05 ` Liu Bo
2012-10-26 3:25 ` Miao Xie
2012-10-26 7:01 ` Liu Bo
2012-11-01 7:43 ` Miao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508906D7.2090402@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.