All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc by multi-task
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:53:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50892821.5010808@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5089045D.8050801@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 10/25/2012 05:20 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
> This patchset introduce multi-task delalloc flush, it can make the delalloc
> flush more faster. And besides that, it also can fix the problem that we join
> the same transaction handler more than 2 times.
> 
> Implementation:
> - Create a new worker pool.
> - Queue the inode with pending delalloc into the work queue of the worker pool
>   when we want to force them into the disk, and then we will wait till all the
>   works we submit are done. 
> - The ordered extents also can be queued into this work queue. The process is
>   similar to the second one.
> 

I can see the potential improvements brought by flushing inodes this way.

But I don't think it makes much sense by making waiting process multi-task,
since even we spread wait order extents into different cpus, they just occpied
the cpu and went on waiting and scheduled then, I mean, the bottleneck is on
what we're waiting for.

Besides, considering that this patchset is about to getting us better performance,
I'm expecting any performance numbers (I'm a little worried about context switches
overhead).

btw, cool ideas indeed.

thanks,
liubo

> Miao Xie (3):
>       Btrfs: make delalloc inodes be flushed by multi-task
>       Btrfs: make ordered operations be handled by multi-task
>       Btrfs: make ordered extent be flushed by multi-task
> 
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h        |   14 +++++++
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c      |    7 ++++
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c        |   78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c |   87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h |    7 +++-
>  fs/btrfs/relocation.c   |    6 +++-
>  fs/btrfs/transaction.c  |   24 ++++++++++---
>  7 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-25 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-25  9:20 [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc by multi-task Miao Xie
2012-10-25  9:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] Btrfs: make delalloc inodes be flushed " Miao Xie
2012-10-25  9:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: make ordered operations be handled " Miao Xie
2012-10-25  9:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] Btrfs: make ordered extent be flushed " Miao Xie
2012-10-25 11:53 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2012-10-26  1:56   ` [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc " Miao Xie
2012-10-26  2:05     ` Liu Bo
2012-10-26  3:25       ` Miao Xie
2012-10-26  7:01         ` Liu Bo
2012-11-01  7:43 ` Miao Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50892821.5010808@oracle.com \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.