From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>,
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on free/reset
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:14:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508AE12F.5080704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508A273E.3020500@ti.com>
On 10/26/2012 01:01 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Jon,
>
> On Friday 26 October 2012 04:22 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> On 10/25/2012 11:34 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>>
>
> [...]
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> index 94cbc84..ce1da19 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> @@ -539,6 +539,8 @@ static void _reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank,
>>> int gpio)
>>> _set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 0);
>>> _clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
>>> _set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>>> + bank->dbck_enable_mask &= ~(GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio));
>>> + _gpio_dbck_disable(bank);
>>
>> We can't use _gpio_dbck_disable() here. This has been specifically
>> implemented
>> for the suspend path and is designed to disable the debounce clock while
>> debounce is enabled (which makes sense). Yes this needs to be cleaned up.
>>
> I thought this bit was clear on v2 discussion list that debounce
> clock disable needs to be conditional based on debounce mask.
Yes that part was crystal clear ;-)
However, what I had overlooked was how _gpio_dbck_disable() was
implemented and is intended to work. Hence, I do not call this new in
the _gpio_clear_debounce() function.
>> From 33812f3bd4f7aab1154e7194b7f11fba700a5086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:00:51 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix clearing of debounce settings on gpio
>> free/reset
>>
>> When a GPIO is freed or shutdown, we need to ensure that any debounce
>> settings
>> are cleared and if the GPIO is the only GPIO in the bank that is
>> currently
>> using debounce, then disable the debounce clock as well to save power.
>>
>> Therefore, introduce a new function called _clear_gpio_debounce() to
>> clear
>> any debounce settings when the GPIO is freed or shutdown.
>>
>> Please note that we cannot use _gpio_dbck_disable() to disable the
>> debounce
>> clock because this has been specifically created for the gpio suspend
>> path
>> and is intended to shutdown the debounce clock while debounce is enabled.
>>
>> This has been unit tested on an OMAP3430 Beagle board, by requesting a
>> gpio,
>> enabling debounce and then freeing the gpio and checking the register
>> contents,
>> the saved register context and the debounce clock state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>> ---
> Now that we are aligned, so we can take this patch forward. Feel free
> to add my ack in case you plan to refresh it.
>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Thanks!
Jon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on free/reset
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:14:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508AE12F.5080704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508A273E.3020500@ti.com>
On 10/26/2012 01:01 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Jon,
>
> On Friday 26 October 2012 04:22 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> On 10/25/2012 11:34 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>>
>
> [...]
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> index 94cbc84..ce1da19 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> @@ -539,6 +539,8 @@ static void _reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank,
>>> int gpio)
>>> _set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 0);
>>> _clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
>>> _set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>>> + bank->dbck_enable_mask &= ~(GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio));
>>> + _gpio_dbck_disable(bank);
>>
>> We can't use _gpio_dbck_disable() here. This has been specifically
>> implemented
>> for the suspend path and is designed to disable the debounce clock while
>> debounce is enabled (which makes sense). Yes this needs to be cleaned up.
>>
> I thought this bit was clear on v2 discussion list that debounce
> clock disable needs to be conditional based on debounce mask.
Yes that part was crystal clear ;-)
However, what I had overlooked was how _gpio_dbck_disable() was
implemented and is intended to work. Hence, I do not call this new in
the _gpio_clear_debounce() function.
>> From 33812f3bd4f7aab1154e7194b7f11fba700a5086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:00:51 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix clearing of debounce settings on gpio
>> free/reset
>>
>> When a GPIO is freed or shutdown, we need to ensure that any debounce
>> settings
>> are cleared and if the GPIO is the only GPIO in the bank that is
>> currently
>> using debounce, then disable the debounce clock as well to save power.
>>
>> Therefore, introduce a new function called _clear_gpio_debounce() to
>> clear
>> any debounce settings when the GPIO is freed or shutdown.
>>
>> Please note that we cannot use _gpio_dbck_disable() to disable the
>> debounce
>> clock because this has been specifically created for the gpio suspend
>> path
>> and is intended to shutdown the debounce clock while debounce is enabled.
>>
>> This has been unit tested on an OMAP3430 Beagle board, by requesting a
>> gpio,
>> enabling debounce and then freeing the gpio and checking the register
>> contents,
>> the saved register context and the debounce clock state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>> ---
> Now that we are aligned, so we can take this patch forward. Feel free
> to add my ack in case you plan to refresh it.
>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Thanks!
Jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 16:34 [PATCH v3] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on free/reset Kevin Hilman
2012-10-25 16:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-25 22:52 ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-25 22:52 ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-25 23:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-25 23:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-26 6:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-26 6:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-26 19:14 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-10-26 19:14 ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-27 16:23 ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-27 16:23 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508AE12F.5080704@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.