From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Test for TID only in BlockAcks while checking tx status
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:18:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508E9048.1060007@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508E77DA.8050708@openwrt.org>
On 2012-10-29 1:34 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-10-29 1:25 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>> The ath9k xmit functions for AMPDUs can send frames as non-aggregate in case
>> only one frame is currently available. The client will then answer using a
>> normal Ack instead of a BlockAck. This acknowledgement has no TID stored and
>> therefore the hardware is not able to provide us the corresponding TID.
>>
>> The TID set by the hardware in the tx status descriptor has to be seen as
>> undefined and not as a valid TID value for normal acknowledgements. Doing
>> otherwise results in a massive amount of retransmissions and stalls of
>> connections.
>>
>> Users may experience low bandwidth and complete connection stalls in
>> environments with transfers using multiple TIDs.
>>
>> This regression was introduced in b11b160defc48e4daa283f785192ea3a23a51f8e
>> ("ath9k: validate the TID in the tx status information").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
> Nice catch, thanks!
> Acked-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
One more thing: I think this deserves a
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
- Felix
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org,
linville@tuxdriver.com, mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com,
Simon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Test for TID only in BlockAcks while checking tx status
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:18:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508E9048.1060007@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508E77DA.8050708@openwrt.org>
On 2012-10-29 1:34 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-10-29 1:25 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>> The ath9k xmit functions for AMPDUs can send frames as non-aggregate in case
>> only one frame is currently available. The client will then answer using a
>> normal Ack instead of a BlockAck. This acknowledgement has no TID stored and
>> therefore the hardware is not able to provide us the corresponding TID.
>>
>> The TID set by the hardware in the tx status descriptor has to be seen as
>> undefined and not as a valid TID value for normal acknowledgements. Doing
>> otherwise results in a massive amount of retransmissions and stalls of
>> connections.
>>
>> Users may experience low bandwidth and complete connection stalls in
>> environments with transfers using multiple TIDs.
>>
>> This regression was introduced in b11b160defc48e4daa283f785192ea3a23a51f8e
>> ("ath9k: validate the TID in the tx status information").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
> Nice catch, thanks!
> Acked-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
One more thing: I think this deserves a
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-29 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 12:25 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Test for TID only in BlockAcks while checking tx status Sven Eckelmann
2012-10-29 12:25 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-10-29 12:34 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-10-29 12:34 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-10-29 14:18 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2012-10-29 14:18 ` Felix Fietkau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508E9048.1060007@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.