From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: kswapd0: excessive CPU usage
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:22:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509C84ED.8090605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509422C3.1000803@suse.cz>
On 11/02/2012 02:45 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 11:53 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 11/02/2012 11:44 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>>>>> Yes, applying this instead of the revert fixes the issue as well.
>>>
>>> I've applied this patch on 3.7.0-rc3 kernel - and I still see excessive
>>> CPU usage - mainly after suspend/resume
>>>
>>> Here is just simple kswapd backtrace from running kernel:
>>
>> Yup, this is what we were seeing with the former patch only too. Try to
>> apply the other one too:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1673231/
>>
>> For me I would say, it is fixed by the two patches now. I won't be able
>> to report later, since I'm leaving to a conference tomorrow.
>
> Damn it. It recurred right now, with both patches applied. After I
> started a java program which consumed some more memory. Though there are
> still 2 gigs free, kswap is spinning:
> [<ffffffff810b00da>] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
> [<ffffffff811318a0>] shrink_slab+0x1c0/0x2d0
> [<ffffffff8113478d>] kswapd+0x66d/0xb60
> [<ffffffff810a25d0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
> [<ffffffff816aa29c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
I'm also hitting this issue in v3.7-rc4. It appears that the last
release not effected by this issue was v3.3. Bisecting the changes
included for v3.4-rc1 showed that this commit introduced the issue:
fe2c2a106663130a5ab45cb0e3414b52df2fff0c is the first bad commit
commit fe2c2a106663130a5ab45cb0e3414b52df2fff0c
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 21 16:33:51 2012 -0700
vmscan: reclaim at order 0 when compaction is enabled
...
This is plausible since the issue seems to be in the kswapd + compaction
realm. I've yet to figure out exactly what about this commit results in
kswapd spinning.
I would be interested if someone can confirm this finding.
--
Seth
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: kswapd0: excessive CPU usage
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:22:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509C84ED.8090605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509422C3.1000803@suse.cz>
On 11/02/2012 02:45 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 11:53 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 11/02/2012 11:44 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>>>>> Yes, applying this instead of the revert fixes the issue as well.
>>>
>>> I've applied this patch on 3.7.0-rc3 kernel - and I still see excessive
>>> CPU usage - mainly after suspend/resume
>>>
>>> Here is just simple kswapd backtrace from running kernel:
>>
>> Yup, this is what we were seeing with the former patch only too. Try to
>> apply the other one too:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1673231/
>>
>> For me I would say, it is fixed by the two patches now. I won't be able
>> to report later, since I'm leaving to a conference tomorrow.
>
> Damn it. It recurred right now, with both patches applied. After I
> started a java program which consumed some more memory. Though there are
> still 2 gigs free, kswap is spinning:
> [<ffffffff810b00da>] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
> [<ffffffff811318a0>] shrink_slab+0x1c0/0x2d0
> [<ffffffff8113478d>] kswapd+0x66d/0xb60
> [<ffffffff810a25d0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
> [<ffffffff816aa29c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
I'm also hitting this issue in v3.7-rc4. It appears that the last
release not effected by this issue was v3.3. Bisecting the changes
included for v3.4-rc1 showed that this commit introduced the issue:
fe2c2a106663130a5ab45cb0e3414b52df2fff0c is the first bad commit
commit fe2c2a106663130a5ab45cb0e3414b52df2fff0c
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 21 16:33:51 2012 -0700
vmscan: reclaim at order 0 when compaction is enabled
...
This is plausible since the issue seems to be in the kswapd + compaction
realm. I've yet to figure out exactly what about this commit results in
kswapd spinning.
I would be interested if someone can confirm this finding.
--
Seth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-11 8:52 kswapd0: wxcessive CPU usage Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 8:52 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 13:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-10-11 15:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 15:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 17:56 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-10-11 17:59 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 17:59 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 18:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-10-11 22:08 ` kswapd0: excessive " Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 22:08 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-12 12:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-12 12:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-12 13:57 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-12 13:57 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-15 9:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-15 9:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-15 11:09 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-15 11:09 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-29 10:52 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-10-29 10:52 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-10-30 19:18 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-30 19:18 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-31 11:25 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-10-31 11:25 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-10-31 15:04 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-31 15:04 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-04 16:36 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-04 16:36 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-02 10:44 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-02 10:44 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-02 10:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-11-02 10:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-11-02 19:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-11-02 19:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-11-04 11:26 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-04 11:26 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-05 14:24 ` [PATCH] Revert "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures" Mel Gorman
2012-11-05 14:24 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 10:15 ` Johannes Hirte
2012-11-06 10:15 ` Johannes Hirte
2012-11-09 8:36 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 8:36 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-14 21:43 ` Johannes Hirte
2012-11-14 21:43 ` Johannes Hirte
2012-11-09 9:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 9:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 4:22 ` Seth Jennings [this message]
2012-11-09 4:22 ` kswapd0: excessive CPU usage Seth Jennings
2012-11-09 8:07 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-09 8:07 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-09 9:06 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 9:06 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-11 9:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-11 9:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-12 11:37 ` [PATCH] Revert "mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD" Mel Gorman
2012-11-12 11:37 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-16 19:14 ` Josh Boyer
2012-11-16 19:14 ` Josh Boyer
2012-11-16 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-16 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-20 1:43 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-11-16 20:06 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-16 20:06 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-20 15:38 ` Josh Boyer
2012-11-20 15:38 ` Josh Boyer
2012-11-20 16:13 ` Bruno Wolff III
2012-11-20 16:13 ` Bruno Wolff III
2012-11-20 17:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-11-20 17:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-11-23 15:20 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-11-23 15:20 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2012-11-27 11:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-27 11:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-21 15:08 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-21 15:08 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-20 9:18 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-20 9:18 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-20 20:18 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-20 20:18 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-21 8:30 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-21 8:30 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-12 12:19 ` kswapd0: excessive CPU usage Mel Gorman
2012-11-12 12:19 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-12 13:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-12 13:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-12 13:31 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-12 13:31 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-12 14:50 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-12 14:50 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-18 19:00 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-18 19:00 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-18 19:07 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-11-18 19:07 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-11-09 8:40 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 8:40 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-11 22:14 ` kswapd0: wxcessive " Andrew Morton
2012-10-11 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-11 22:26 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-10-11 22:26 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509C84ED.8090605@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.