From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maxime.coquelin@stericsson.com,
loic.pallardy@stericsson.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
kmpark@infradead.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
lenb@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, gargankita@gmail.com,
amit.kachhap@linaro.org, thomas.abraham@linaro.org,
santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8][Sorted-buddy] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support Memory Power Management
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:04:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509D3088.2060507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509D2B9B.4090305@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 11/09/2012 09:43 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 07:23 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> FWIW, kernbench is actually (and surprisingly) showing a slight performance
>> *improvement* with this patchset, over vanilla 3.7-rc3, as I mentioned in
>> my other email to Dave.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/7/428
>>
>> I don't think I can dismiss it as an experimental error, because I am seeing
>> those results consistently.. I'm trying to find out what's behind that.
>
> The only numbers in that link are in the date. :) Let's see the
> numbers, please.
>
Sure :) The reason I didn't post the numbers very eagerly was that I didn't
want it to look ridiculous if it later turned out to be really an error in the
experiment ;) But since I have seen it happening consistently I think I can
post the numbers here with some non-zero confidence.
> If you really have performance improvement to the memory allocator (or
> something else) here, then surely it can be pared out of your patches
> and merged quickly by itself. Those kinds of optimizations are hard to
> come by!
>
:-)
Anyway, here it goes:
Test setup:
----------
x86 2-socket quad-core machine. (CONFIG_NUMA=n because I figured that my
patchset might not handle NUMA properly). Mem region size = 512 MB.
Kernbench log for Vanilla 3.7-rc3
=================================
Kernel: 3.7.0-rc3-vanilla-default
Average Optimal load -j 32 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 650.742 (2.49774)
User Time 8213.08 (17.6347)
System Time 1273.91 (6.00643)
Percent CPU 1457.4 (3.64692)
Context Switches 2250203 (3846.61)
Sleeps 1.8781e+06 (5310.33)
Kernbench log for this sorted-buddy patchset
============================================
Kernel: 3.7.0-rc3-sorted-buddy-default
Average Optimal load -j 32 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 591.696 (0.660969)
User Time 7511.97 (1.08313)
System Time 1062.99 (1.1109)
Percent CPU 1448.6 (1.94936)
Context Switches 2.1496e+06 (3507.12)
Sleeps 1.84305e+06 (3092.67)
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maxime.coquelin@stericsson.com,
loic.pallardy@stericsson.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
kmpark@infradead.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
lenb@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, gargankita@gmail.com,
amit.kachhap@linaro.org, thomas.abraham@linaro.org,
santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8][Sorted-buddy] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support Memory Power Management
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:04:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509D3088.2060507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509D2B9B.4090305@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 11/09/2012 09:43 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 07:23 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> FWIW, kernbench is actually (and surprisingly) showing a slight performance
>> *improvement* with this patchset, over vanilla 3.7-rc3, as I mentioned in
>> my other email to Dave.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/7/428
>>
>> I don't think I can dismiss it as an experimental error, because I am seeing
>> those results consistently.. I'm trying to find out what's behind that.
>
> The only numbers in that link are in the date. :) Let's see the
> numbers, please.
>
Sure :) The reason I didn't post the numbers very eagerly was that I didn't
want it to look ridiculous if it later turned out to be really an error in the
experiment ;) But since I have seen it happening consistently I think I can
post the numbers here with some non-zero confidence.
> If you really have performance improvement to the memory allocator (or
> something else) here, then surely it can be pared out of your patches
> and merged quickly by itself. Those kinds of optimizations are hard to
> come by!
>
:-)
Anyway, here it goes:
Test setup:
----------
x86 2-socket quad-core machine. (CONFIG_NUMA=n because I figured that my
patchset might not handle NUMA properly). Mem region size = 512 MB.
Kernbench log for Vanilla 3.7-rc3
=================================
Kernel: 3.7.0-rc3-vanilla-default
Average Optimal load -j 32 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 650.742 (2.49774)
User Time 8213.08 (17.6347)
System Time 1273.91 (6.00643)
Percent CPU 1457.4 (3.64692)
Context Switches 2250203 (3846.61)
Sleeps 1.8781e+06 (5310.33)
Kernbench log for this sorted-buddy patchset
============================================
Kernel: 3.7.0-rc3-sorted-buddy-default
Average Optimal load -j 32 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 591.696 (0.660969)
User Time 7511.97 (1.08313)
System Time 1062.99 (1.1109)
Percent CPU 1448.6 (1.94936)
Context Switches 2.1496e+06 (3507.12)
Sleeps 1.84305e+06 (3092.67)
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 19:52 [RFC PATCH 0/8][Sorted-buddy] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support Memory Power Management Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:52 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm: Introduce memory regions data-structure to capture region boundaries within node Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:52 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 23:03 ` Dave Hansen
2012-11-06 23:03 ` Dave Hansen
2012-11-07 20:12 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-07 20:12 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Initialize node memory regions during boot Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:52 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:25 ` wujianguo
2012-12-04 8:25 ` wujianguo
2012-11-06 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm: Introduce and initialize zone memory regions Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:53 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm: Add helpers to retrieve node region and zone region for a given page Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:53 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-16 18:39 ` [RFC PATCH UPDATED " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-16 18:39 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm: Add data-structures to describe memory regions within the zones' freelists Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:53 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] mm: Demarcate and maintain pageblocks in region-order in " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:53 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 21:49 ` Dave Hansen
2012-11-06 21:49 ` Dave Hansen
2012-11-07 20:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-07 20:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 6:22 ` Ankita Garg
2012-11-09 6:01 ` Ankita Garg
2012-11-09 9:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 9:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:54 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] mm: Add an optimized version of del_from_freelist to keep page allocation fast Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:54 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:54 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm: Print memory region statistics to understand the buddy allocator behavior Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-06 19:54 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-08 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8][Sorted-buddy] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support Memory Power Management Mel Gorman
2012-11-08 18:02 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-08 19:38 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-08 19:38 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 5:14 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-11-09 5:14 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-11-09 9:00 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 9:00 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 14:51 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 14:51 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 15:23 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 15:23 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 16:13 ` Dave Hansen
2012-11-09 16:13 ` Dave Hansen
2012-11-09 16:34 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-11-09 16:34 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 16:43 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 16:43 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 16:52 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 16:52 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-16 18:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-16 18:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-09 15:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-11-09 15:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-11-09 16:48 ` SrinivasPandruvada
2012-11-12 16:14 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-11-12 16:14 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 10:51 ` wujianguo
2012-12-04 10:51 ` wujianguo
2012-12-06 6:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-06 6:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-09 18:14 Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509D3088.2060507@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@linaro.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gargankita@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.pallardy@stericsson.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@stericsson.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.