All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] libqblock OOM issue
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:06:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A36D3F.4080001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A35C81.2020602@redhat.com>

> Il 14/11/2012 04:50, Wenchao Xia ha scritto:
>>    There are some different way to implement, not sure which would be
>> better:
>>    1 keep client as thin as possible, client stores opaque pointer used
>> in server side, for eg, QBlockContext *ctx, client only get a pointer
>> pointing to the address where server stores really the object. This
>> have risk when server/client crash and reconnect.
>>    2 client and server maintains index for QBlockContext and QBlockState.
>>    3 thick client and server layer, expose all structure details in .x
>> file, each API have a correspond rpc call. .x file may be complex.
>>    4 define a custom protocol on XDR, like libvirt, this may need many
>> code in server/client side.
>>
>>    also with method 1-3, Consider wrapping following API:
>> int qb_context_new(QBlockContext **context);
> 
> What is the return value of qb_context_new?  Can it simply return
> QBlockContext*?
> 
  Yes it can return QBlockContext*. There are more APIs take 3 or 4
parameters, which may be used to retrieve result. In that case I am
afraid a return structure can't be avoided, this may result .x file
looks strange.

>>    The parameter context is a pointer that will be modified, it seems
>> sunrpc does not transfer back modified parameter by server to client, so
>> I need to define a structure as
>> struct qb_context_new_ret {
>>    int ret;
>>    int opaque_len;
>>    char *opaque_val;
>> }
>> and use that as rpc call's return structure. In this way each API
>> wrapped need a new defined internal structure make things complicate.
>> so I am wondering if there is a better way to do it.
> 
> Surely not all of the APIs return structs this way, however...
> 
> Paolo
> 


-- 
Best Regards

Wenchao Xia

      reply	other threads:[~2012-11-14 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50A313A5.8030500@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-11-14  3:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] libqblock OOM issue Wenchao Xia
2012-11-14  8:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-11-14  9:55     ` Wenchao Xia
2012-11-14 10:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-15  4:18         ` Wenchao Xia
2012-11-15 10:31           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-15 12:21             ` Wenchao Xia
2012-11-15 12:34               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-14  8:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-14 10:06     ` Wenchao Xia [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A36D3F.4080001@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.