All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] libqblock OOM issue
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:18:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A46D1D.5040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A37325.9030607@redhat.com>

于 2012-11-14 18:32, Paolo Bonzini 写道:
> Il 14/11/2012 10:55, Wenchao Xia ha scritto:
>>>     In order to resolve OOM issue, I am trying wrap all APIs using
>>> sunrpc, need some suggestion before coding.
>>
>> Is the client/server approach really necessary or can you write a
>> library that invokes qemu-nbd/qemu-img?
>>
>> If there is a startup cost problem with qemu-img it may be possible to
>> add an interactive mode (like qemu-io) where qemu-img stays open and
>> responds to commands (maybe in JSON encoding).
>>
>> The difference between this and the RPC approach is that you can write a
>> relatively thin NBD and qemu-img library with the tools that already
>> exist today.
>
> In fact, I think this is not our issue.  If libvirt wants to use
> libqblock but have a problem with OOM exit, they can write their own
> wrappers to do the simple tasks they need, or just keep on using
> qemu-img with JSON output (possibly extending it and keeping the
> functionality upstream).  For many of those tasks, it may turn out that
> qemu-img extensions would be useful anyway.
>
> Paolo
>
   Personally agree, but I want to add a simple wrapper to let libqblock
get user faster. In this way I guess best choice now is making rpc
client and server not mirrored in implemention, server provides
r/w/info retrieving capabilities via XDR protocol, client keeps
the API unchanged but implement a bit different than server, which
may archieve the same effect as invoking qemu-img inside without string
parsing.
   Not sure if libqblock now is blocked by OOM issue as 1st version to
be reviewed. If you think it must be resolved first, I would add this
wrapper quickly.

-- 
Best Regards

Wenchao Xia

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50A313A5.8030500@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-11-14  3:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] libqblock OOM issue Wenchao Xia
2012-11-14  8:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-11-14  9:55     ` Wenchao Xia
2012-11-14 10:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-15  4:18         ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2012-11-15 10:31           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-15 12:21             ` Wenchao Xia
2012-11-15 12:34               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-14  8:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-14 10:06     ` Wenchao Xia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A46D1D.5040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.