All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: i.mazanov@gmail.com, Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove inline from clock framework function definitions to build the kernel with GCC 4.7
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:24:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A53368.6090306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A52134.2010502@gmail.com>


On 11/15/2012 11:07 AM, Igor Mazanov wrote:
>  Remove inline from clock framework function definitions to
>  build the kernel with GCC 4.7

Adding Mike to the party ...

May be good to add some details about the exact problem seen.

I am seeing the same problem today with GCC 4.7 and Tony's master
branch. For a bit of background it seems that for 4.7 not having
the body of the inlined function available in the header is
causing this error. Another example here [1].

The actual compiler error seen for OMAP is ...

In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c:25:0:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c: In function ‘clkdm_clk_disable’:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:338:12: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘__clk_get_enable_count’: function body not available
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c:1001:28: error: called from here
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2

 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mazanov <i.mazanov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index c127315..f9f5e9e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -335,8 +335,8 @@ const char *__clk_get_name(struct clk *clk);
>  struct clk_hw *__clk_get_hw(struct clk *clk);
>  u8 __clk_get_num_parents(struct clk *clk);
>  struct clk *__clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk);
> -inline int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> -inline int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
> +int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> +int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
>  unsigned long __clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk);
>  unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk);
>  int __clk_is_enabled(struct clk *clk);

Do we also need to remove the inline from the functions declared in
drivers/clk/clk.c too?

Cheers
Jon

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/983496

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Remove inline from clock framework function definitions to build the kernel with GCC 4.7
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:24:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A53368.6090306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A52134.2010502@gmail.com>


On 11/15/2012 11:07 AM, Igor Mazanov wrote:
>  Remove inline from clock framework function definitions to
>  build the kernel with GCC 4.7

Adding Mike to the party ...

May be good to add some details about the exact problem seen.

I am seeing the same problem today with GCC 4.7 and Tony's master
branch. For a bit of background it seems that for 4.7 not having
the body of the inlined function available in the header is
causing this error. Another example here [1].

The actual compiler error seen for OMAP is ...

In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c:25:0:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c: In function ?clkdm_clk_disable?:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:338:12: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ?__clk_get_enable_count?: function body not available
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c:1001:28: error: called from here
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2

 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mazanov <i.mazanov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index c127315..f9f5e9e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -335,8 +335,8 @@ const char *__clk_get_name(struct clk *clk);
>  struct clk_hw *__clk_get_hw(struct clk *clk);
>  u8 __clk_get_num_parents(struct clk *clk);
>  struct clk *__clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk);
> -inline int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> -inline int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
> +int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> +int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
>  unsigned long __clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk);
>  unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk);
>  int __clk_is_enabled(struct clk *clk);

Do we also need to remove the inline from the functions declared in
drivers/clk/clk.c too?

Cheers
Jon

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/983496

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: <i.mazanov@gmail.com>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	<tony@atomide.com>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove inline from clock framework function definitions to build the kernel with GCC 4.7
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:24:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A53368.6090306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A52134.2010502@gmail.com>


On 11/15/2012 11:07 AM, Igor Mazanov wrote:
>  Remove inline from clock framework function definitions to
>  build the kernel with GCC 4.7

Adding Mike to the party ...

May be good to add some details about the exact problem seen.

I am seeing the same problem today with GCC 4.7 and Tony's master
branch. For a bit of background it seems that for 4.7 not having
the body of the inlined function available in the header is
causing this error. Another example here [1].

The actual compiler error seen for OMAP is ...

In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c:25:0:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c: In function ‘clkdm_clk_disable’:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:338:12: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘__clk_get_enable_count’: function body not available
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c:1001:28: error: called from here
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2

 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mazanov <i.mazanov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index c127315..f9f5e9e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -335,8 +335,8 @@ const char *__clk_get_name(struct clk *clk);
>  struct clk_hw *__clk_get_hw(struct clk *clk);
>  u8 __clk_get_num_parents(struct clk *clk);
>  struct clk *__clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk);
> -inline int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> -inline int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
> +int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> +int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
>  unsigned long __clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk);
>  unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk);
>  int __clk_is_enabled(struct clk *clk);

Do we also need to remove the inline from the functions declared in
drivers/clk/clk.c too?

Cheers
Jon

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/983496

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 17:07 [PATCH] Remove inline from clock framework function definitions to build the kernel with GCC 4.7 Igor Mazanov
2012-11-15 17:07 ` Igor Mazanov
2012-11-15 18:24 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-11-15 18:24   ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-15 18:24   ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-15 18:45   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-11-15 18:45     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-11-15 18:46 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-11-15 18:46   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-11-16 17:16   ` Igor Mazanov
2012-11-16 17:16     ` Igor Mazanov
2012-11-16 17:39     ` Mike Turquette
2012-11-16 17:39       ` Mike Turquette
2012-11-16 17:39       ` Mike Turquette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A53368.6090306@ti.com \
    --to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=i.mazanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mturquette@ti.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.