All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] pinctrl: at91: Prevent NULL dereference if of_match_device returns NULL
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:36:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A5FB17.1050208@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121115100012.GA4398@game.jcrosoft.org>

On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 12:58 Thu 15 Nov     , Axel Lin wrote:
>> of_match_device() may return NULL.
> this is not possible on at91
> 
> and I do a oups here as if we have a NULL pointer which means the driver is
> wrong

Well, okay, but it does not prevent from adding a supplementary check to
mimic every other pinctrl driver and use a common return path to the
of_match_device() function.

So I am not completely against this patch (that I why I added my Acked-by).


>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
>> ---
>> This resend CC Jean-Christophe.
>>
>>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c |   17 +++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> index 8490a55..32006c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> @@ -829,13 +829,18 @@ static int __devinit at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>  	uint32_t *tmp;
>>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>  	struct device_node *child;
>> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>>  
>>  	if (!np)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>> +	match = of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> +	if (!match)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>>  	info->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> -	info->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops*)
>> -		of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> +	info->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) match->data;
>> +
>>  	at91_pinctrl_child_count(info, np);
>>  
>>  	if (info->nbanks < 1) {
>> @@ -1359,6 +1364,7 @@ static struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] __devinitdata = {
>>  static int __devinit at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>>  	struct resource *res;
>>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_chip = NULL;
>>  	struct gpio_chip *chip;
>> @@ -1399,8 +1405,11 @@ static int __devinit at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		goto err;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	at91_chip->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops*)
>> -		of_match_device(at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> +	match = of_match_device(at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev);
>> +	if (!match)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	at91_chip->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) match->data;
>>  	at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq;
>>  	at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx;
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] pinctrl: at91: Prevent NULL dereference if of_match_device returns NULL
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:36:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A5FB17.1050208@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121115100012.GA4398@game.jcrosoft.org>

On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 12:58 Thu 15 Nov     , Axel Lin wrote:
>> of_match_device() may return NULL.
> this is not possible on at91
> 
> and I do a oups here as if we have a NULL pointer which means the driver is
> wrong

Well, okay, but it does not prevent from adding a supplementary check to
mimic every other pinctrl driver and use a common return path to the
of_match_device() function.

So I am not completely against this patch (that I why I added my Acked-by).


>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
>> ---
>> This resend CC Jean-Christophe.
>>
>>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c |   17 +++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> index 8490a55..32006c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> @@ -829,13 +829,18 @@ static int __devinit at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>  	uint32_t *tmp;
>>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>  	struct device_node *child;
>> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>>  
>>  	if (!np)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>> +	match = of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> +	if (!match)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>>  	info->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> -	info->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops*)
>> -		of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> +	info->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) match->data;
>> +
>>  	at91_pinctrl_child_count(info, np);
>>  
>>  	if (info->nbanks < 1) {
>> @@ -1359,6 +1364,7 @@ static struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] __devinitdata = {
>>  static int __devinit at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>>  	struct resource *res;
>>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_chip = NULL;
>>  	struct gpio_chip *chip;
>> @@ -1399,8 +1405,11 @@ static int __devinit at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		goto err;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	at91_chip->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops*)
>> -		of_match_device(at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> +	match = of_match_device(at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev);
>> +	if (!match)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	at91_chip->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) match->data;
>>  	at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq;
>>  	at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx;
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-16  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15  4:51 [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: dove: Prevent NULL dereference if of_match_device returns NULL Axel Lin
2012-11-15  4:51 ` Axel Lin
2012-11-15  4:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: kirkwood: " Axel Lin
2012-11-15  4:52   ` Axel Lin
2012-11-15 19:18   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-15 19:18     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-15  4:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: at91: " Axel Lin
2012-11-15  4:54   ` Axel Lin
2012-11-15  4:58   ` [PATCH RESEND " Axel Lin
2012-11-15  4:58     ` Axel Lin
2012-11-15  8:23     ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-15  8:23       ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-15 10:00     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-15 10:00       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-16  8:36       ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2012-11-16  8:36         ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-16  9:39         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-16  9:39           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-15  4:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: nomadik: " Axel Lin
2012-11-15  4:56   ` Axel Lin
2012-11-15 14:42   ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-15 14:42     ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-15 15:15     ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 15:15       ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15  7:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: dove: " Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-15  7:35   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-15 13:44   ` Axel Lin
2012-11-15 13:56     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-15 13:56       ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A5FB17.1050208@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.