All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [rfc net-next v6 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:18:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A9CF30.9090503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nl5yn4k.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On 11/05/2012 07:16 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> writes:
>> This addes multiqueue support to virtio_net driver. There's two mode supported:
>> single queue pair mode and multiple queue pairs mode. An obvious
>> difference compared with a physical mq card is that virtio-net reserve
>> first two virtqueues when it is working in multiqueue mode, this is
>> used for implementing adaptive mode switching in the future. The
>> virtqueues that were in both mq and sq mode were initialized and only
>> one queue pair (single queue mode) were used at default. User could
>> use ethtool -L to switch to multiqueue mode withe the next patch.
> Hi Jason,
>
>          This first patch looks good, but conflates three things
> together:
> (1) Separate per-queue structures from struct virtnet_info to allow
>      multiple queues.  This is the mechanical part of the patch.
> (2) An annotation bugfix, see below.
> (3) Enabling mq using a new feature and negotiation.

Hi Rusty:

Sorry for the late response, just back from vacation.

For 1 and 3, I will split the patch as you suggested.
For 2, will fix it.

Thanks
>
>> @@ -700,7 +767,8 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev,
>>   	unsigned int start;
>>   
>>   	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> -		struct virtnet_stats *stats = per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu);
>> +		struct virtnet_stats __percpu *stats
>> +			= per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu);
>>   		u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes;
>>   
>>   		do {
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc net-next v6 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:18:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A9CF30.9090503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nl5yn4k.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On 11/05/2012 07:16 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> writes:
>> This addes multiqueue support to virtio_net driver. There's two mode supported:
>> single queue pair mode and multiple queue pairs mode. An obvious
>> difference compared with a physical mq card is that virtio-net reserve
>> first two virtqueues when it is working in multiqueue mode, this is
>> used for implementing adaptive mode switching in the future. The
>> virtqueues that were in both mq and sq mode were initialized and only
>> one queue pair (single queue mode) were used at default. User could
>> use ethtool -L to switch to multiqueue mode withe the next patch.
> Hi Jason,
>
>          This first patch looks good, but conflates three things
> together:
> (1) Separate per-queue structures from struct virtnet_info to allow
>      multiple queues.  This is the mechanical part of the patch.
> (2) An annotation bugfix, see below.
> (3) Enabling mq using a new feature and negotiation.

Hi Rusty:

Sorry for the late response, just back from vacation.

For 1 and 3, I will split the patch as you suggested.
For 2, will fix it.

Thanks
>
>> @@ -700,7 +767,8 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev,
>>   	unsigned int start;
>>   
>>   	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> -		struct virtnet_stats *stats = per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu);
>> +		struct virtnet_stats __percpu *stats
>> +			= per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu);
>>   		u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes;
>>   
>>   		do {
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-19  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-30 10:03 [rfc net-next v6 0/3] Multiqueue virtio-net Jason Wang
2012-10-30 10:03 ` Jason Wang
2012-10-30 10:03 ` [rfc net-next v6 1/3] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE Jason Wang
2012-10-30 10:03   ` Jason Wang
2012-10-30 10:03 ` [rfc net-next v6 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support Jason Wang
2012-10-30 10:03   ` Jason Wang
2012-11-04 23:16   ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-04 23:16     ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-19  6:18     ` Jason Wang [this message]
2012-11-19  6:18       ` Jason Wang
2012-11-05  1:08   ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-05  1:08     ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-13  6:40     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-11-13  6:40       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-11-17  0:35       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-11-17  0:35         ` Ben Hutchings
2012-11-18  9:13         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-11-18  9:13           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-11-19 18:44           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-11-19 18:44           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-11-19  7:40     ` Jason Wang
2012-11-19  7:40       ` Jason Wang
2012-10-30 10:03 ` [rfc net-next v6 3/3] virtio-net: change the number of queues through ethtool Jason Wang
2012-10-30 10:03   ` Jason Wang
2012-11-04 23:46   ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-04 23:46     ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-19  6:22     ` Jason Wang
2012-11-19  6:22       ` Jason Wang
2012-11-08 21:13   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-11-08 21:13     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-30 19:05 ` [rfc net-next v6 0/3] Multiqueue virtio-net Rick Jones
2012-10-30 19:05   ` Rick Jones
2012-10-31 10:33   ` Jason Wang
2012-10-31 10:33     ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A9CF30.9090503@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.