From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] mount: Added the -o v4.1 mount option
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:40:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AAA75E.70703@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9092EF4AA@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
On 19/11/12 13:29, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> Note that the mount command should in any case not be relying on rpcbind
> to decide whether or not the server supports NFSv4.
Of course....
>
> As for minor version negotiation, RFC3530 already tells you how to do
> this: the client has to start with the highest version that it supports,
> and then walk that number down until the server stops replying with
> NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH.
Perfect... I think we should do *all* v4 negotiation from the mount
command... It's so much acceptable to replace mount.nfs binaries
than kernels...
>
> Note that if you want to do this in userland before calling the mount
> syscall, then the spec does allow you to "ping" the NFSv4 server with an
> empty COMPOUND.
The type of functionality will allow us to better deal with legacy servers, IMHO..
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 15:43 [RFC PATCH V2] mount: Added the -o v4.1 mount option Steve Dickson
2012-11-19 15:54 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 15:58 ` Steve Dickson
2012-11-19 16:02 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 16:14 ` Steve Dickson
2012-11-19 16:24 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 18:11 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-19 18:29 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 18:39 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-19 19:04 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 21:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-19 21:40 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2012-11-19 18:21 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-19 21:51 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AAA75E.70703@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.