From: Don Dutile <ddutile-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tom Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah.khan-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] intel-iommu: Prevent devices with RMRRs from being placed into SI Domain
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:37:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50ABEA26.6090500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120917082234.22091.84161.sendpatchset@RHEL63BL460c>
On 11/20/2012 02:43 PM, Tom Mingarelli wrote:
> This patch is to prevent non-USB devices that have RMRRs associated with them from
> being placed into the SI Domain during init. This fixes the issue where the RMRR info
> for devices being placed in and out of the SI Domain gets lost.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Mingarelli<thomas.mingarelli-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Shuah Khan<shuah.khan-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> PATCH v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/15/204
> PATCH v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/354
> PATCH v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/375
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for the efforts in getting this completed.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Donald Dutile <ddutile-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index d4a4cd4..8c064df 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -2320,8 +2320,39 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool device_has_rmrr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
> + for (i = 0; i< rmrr->devices_cnt; i++) {
> + /*
> + * Return TRUE if this RMRR contains the device that
> + * is passed in.
> + */
> + if (rmrr->devices[i] == dev)
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int iommu_should_identity_map(struct pci_dev *pdev, int startup)
> {
> +
> + /*
> + * We want to prevent any device associated with an RMRR from
> + * getting placed into the SI Domain. This is done because
> + * problems exist when devices are moved in and out of domains
> + * and their respective RMRR info is lost. We exempt USB devices
> + * from this process due to their usage of RMRRs that are known
> + * to not be needed after BIOS hand-off to OS.
> + */
> + if (device_has_rmrr(pdev)&&
> + (pdev->class>> 8) != PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB)
> + return 0;
> +
> if ((iommu_identity_mapping& IDENTMAP_AZALIA)&& IS_AZALIA(pdev))
> return 1;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Tom Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli@hp.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@hp.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] intel-iommu: Prevent devices with RMRRs from being placed into SI Domain
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:37:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50ABEA26.6090500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120917082234.22091.84161.sendpatchset@RHEL63BL460c>
On 11/20/2012 02:43 PM, Tom Mingarelli wrote:
> This patch is to prevent non-USB devices that have RMRRs associated with them from
> being placed into the SI Domain during init. This fixes the issue where the RMRR info
> for devices being placed in and out of the SI Domain gets lost.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Mingarelli<thomas.mingarelli@hp.com>
> Tested-by: Shuah Khan<shuah.khan@hp.com>
> ---
> PATCH v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/15/204
> PATCH v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/354
> PATCH v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/375
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for the efforts in getting this completed.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index d4a4cd4..8c064df 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -2320,8 +2320,39 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool device_has_rmrr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
> + for (i = 0; i< rmrr->devices_cnt; i++) {
> + /*
> + * Return TRUE if this RMRR contains the device that
> + * is passed in.
> + */
> + if (rmrr->devices[i] == dev)
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int iommu_should_identity_map(struct pci_dev *pdev, int startup)
> {
> +
> + /*
> + * We want to prevent any device associated with an RMRR from
> + * getting placed into the SI Domain. This is done because
> + * problems exist when devices are moved in and out of domains
> + * and their respective RMRR info is lost. We exempt USB devices
> + * from this process due to their usage of RMRRs that are known
> + * to not be needed after BIOS hand-off to OS.
> + */
> + if (device_has_rmrr(pdev)&&
> + (pdev->class>> 8) != PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB)
> + return 0;
> +
> if ((iommu_identity_mapping& IDENTMAP_AZALIA)&& IS_AZALIA(pdev))
> return 1;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-20 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-20 19:43 [PATCH v4] intel-iommu: Prevent devices with RMRRs from being placed into SI Domain Tom Mingarelli
2012-11-20 19:43 ` Tom Mingarelli
2012-11-20 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2012-11-20 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2012-11-20 20:37 ` Don Dutile [this message]
2012-11-20 20:37 ` Don Dutile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50ABEA26.6090500@redhat.com \
--to=ddutile-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shuah.khan-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thomas.mingarelli-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.