From: ludovic.desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com,
nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: at91: add dma support
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:45:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50ACA2D4.9040904@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121116170514.GA21903@pengutronix.de>
Hi Wolfram,
Sorry for the delay, I have realized that my answer was not sent
correctly since I don't see it into the i2c archives.
Le 11/16/2012 06:05 PM, Wolfram Sang a écrit :
> Hi Ludovic,
>
>> Here is the third version taking into account your feedback.
>
> Thanks, looks mostly good. I have problems applying patch 3. What is
> this series based against?
>
It was based against v3.7-rc4. Do you want me to rebase it against an
over version?
>> Patch 1/3 should go into v3.7.
>
> No, not necessarily. It is not really a bugfix, and it is probably too
> late in the cycle for compiler silencing. Ah well, I decide later.
>
> BTW if you use --strict with checkpatch, it will tell you about the
> space after casts :)
>
Ok, thanks for the tips.
Regards
Ludovic
> Regards,
>
> Wolfram
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: at91: add dma support
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:45:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50ACA2D4.9040904@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121116170514.GA21903@pengutronix.de>
Hi Wolfram,
Sorry for the delay, I have realized that my answer was not sent
correctly since I don't see it into the i2c archives.
Le 11/16/2012 06:05 PM, Wolfram Sang a ?crit :
> Hi Ludovic,
>
>> Here is the third version taking into account your feedback.
>
> Thanks, looks mostly good. I have problems applying patch 3. What is
> this series based against?
>
It was based against v3.7-rc4. Do you want me to rebase it against an
over version?
>> Patch 1/3 should go into v3.7.
>
> No, not necessarily. It is not really a bugfix, and it is probably too
> late in the cycle for compiler silencing. Ah well, I decide later.
>
> BTW if you use --strict with checkpatch, it will tell you about the
> space after casts :)
>
Ok, thanks for the tips.
Regards
Ludovic
> Regards,
>
> Wolfram
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-21 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-14 16:44 [PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: at91: add dma support ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w
2012-11-14 16:44 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
[not found] ` <1352911493-6979-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-14 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: at91: fix compilation warning ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w
2012-11-14 16:44 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
[not found] ` <1352911493-6979-2-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-15 17:16 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-15 17:16 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-14 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: at91: change struct members indentation ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w
2012-11-14 16:44 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
[not found] ` <1352911493-6979-3-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-15 17:19 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-15 17:19 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-14 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] i2c: at91: add dma support ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w
2012-11-14 16:44 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
[not found] ` <1352911493-6979-4-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-15 17:21 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-15 17:21 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-16 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Wolfram Sang
2012-11-16 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-21 9:45 ` ludovic.desroches [this message]
2012-11-21 9:45 ` ludovic.desroches
[not found] ` <50ACA2D4.9040904-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-22 21:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-22 21:40 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50ACA2D4.9040904@atmel.com \
--to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.