Re: [PATCH V2] Resend - Enabling IA32_TSC_ADJUST for Qemu KVM guest VMs

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Hello,

Am 26.11.2012 19:42, schrieb Will Auld:
> CPUID.7.0.EBX[1]=1 indicates IA32_TSC_ADJUST MSR 0x3b is supported
> 
> Basic design is to emulate the MSR by allowing reads and writes to the
> hypervisor vcpu specific locations to store the value of the emulated MSRs.
> In this way the IA32_TSC_ADJUST value will be included in all reads to
> the TSC MSR whether through rdmsr or rdtsc.
> 
> As this is a new MSR that the guest may access and modify its value needs
> to be migrated along with the other MRSs. The changes here are specifically
> for recognizing when IA32_TSC_ADJUST is enabled in CPUID and code added
> for migrating its value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Auld <will.auld@intel.com>

$subject should get a prefix of "target-i386: " and "resend" is better
used inside a tag so that it doesn't end up in the commit.
And it's "QEMU". ;)

Some more stylistic issues inline:

> ---
>  target-i386/cpu.h     |  2 ++
>  target-i386/kvm.c     | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  target-i386/machine.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
> index aabf993..13d4152 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
> @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@
>  #define MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP           (1<<8)
>  #define MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE        (1<<11)
>  #define MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BASE          (0xfffff<<12)
> +#define MSR_TSC_ADJUST	 		0x0000003b

Tabs. You can use scripts/checkpatch.pl to verify.

>  #define MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE            0x6e0
>  
>  #define MSR_MTRRcap			0xfe
> @@ -701,6 +702,7 @@ typedef struct CPUX86State {
>      uint64_t async_pf_en_msr;
>  
>      uint64_t tsc;
> +    uint64_t tsc_adjust;
>      uint64_t tsc_deadline;
>  
>      uint64_t mcg_status;
> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
> index 696b14a..e974c42 100644
> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = {
>  
>  static bool has_msr_star;
>  static bool has_msr_hsave_pa;
> +static bool has_msr_tsc_adjust;
>  static bool has_msr_tsc_deadline;
>  static bool has_msr_async_pf_en;
>  static bool has_msr_misc_enable;
> @@ -641,6 +642,10 @@ static int kvm_get_supported_msrs(KVMState *s)
>                      has_msr_hsave_pa = true;
>                      continue;
>                  }
> +                if (kvm_msr_list->indices[i] == MSR_TSC_ADJUST) {
> +                    has_msr_tsc_adjust = true;
> +                    continue;
> +                }
>                  if (kvm_msr_list->indices[i] == MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE) {
>                      has_msr_tsc_deadline = true;
>                      continue;
> @@ -978,6 +983,10 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(CPUX86State *env, int level)
>      if (has_msr_hsave_pa) {
>          kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA, env->vm_hsave);
>      }
> +    if (has_msr_tsc_adjust) {
> +        kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], 
> +			MSR_TSC_ADJUST, env->tsc_adjust);

Tabs.

> +    }
>      if (has_msr_tsc_deadline) {
>          kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE, env->tsc_deadline);
>      }
> @@ -1234,6 +1243,9 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(CPUX86State *env)
>      if (has_msr_hsave_pa) {
>          msrs[n++].index = MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA;
>      }
> +    if (has_msr_tsc_adjust) {
> +        msrs[n++].index = MSR_TSC_ADJUST;
> +    }
>      if (has_msr_tsc_deadline) {
>          msrs[n++].index = MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE;
>      }
> @@ -1308,6 +1320,9 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(CPUX86State *env)
>          case MSR_IA32_TSC:
>              env->tsc = msrs[i].data;
>              break;
> +        case MSR_TSC_ADJUST:
> +            env->tsc_adjust = msrs[i].data;
> +            break;
>          case MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE:
>              env->tsc_deadline = msrs[i].data;
>              break;
> diff --git a/target-i386/machine.c b/target-i386/machine.c
> index a8be058..95bda9b 100644
> --- a/target-i386/machine.c
> +++ b/target-i386/machine.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,24 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_fpop_ip_dp = {
>      }
>  };
>  
> +static bool tsc_adjust_needed(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    CPUX86State *cpu = opaque;

Please name this "env" to differentiate from CPUState / X86CPU.
Since there are other tsc_* fields already I won't request that you move
your new field to the containing X86CPU struct but at some point we will
need to convert the VMSDs to X86CPU.

> +
> +    return cpu->tsc_adjust != 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_msr_tsc_adjust = {
> +    .name = "cpu/msr_tsc_adjust",
> +    .version_id = 1,
> +    .minimum_version_id = 1,
> +    .minimum_version_id_old = 1,
> +    .fields      = (VMStateField []) {
> +        VMSTATE_UINT64(tsc_adjust, CPUX86State),
> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> +    }
> +};
> +
>  static bool tscdeadline_needed(void *opaque)
>  {
>      CPUX86State *env = opaque;
> @@ -457,6 +475,9 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu = {
>              .vmsd = &vmstate_fpop_ip_dp,
>              .needed = fpop_ip_dp_needed,
>          }, {
> +            .vmsd = &vmstate_msr_tsc_adjust,
> +            .needed = tsc_adjust_needed,
> +        }, {
>              .vmsd = &vmstate_msr_tscdeadline,
>              .needed = tscdeadline_needed,
>          }, {

Otherwise looks okay to me. I'm expecting this to go through Marcello's
queue unless I'm told otherwise.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg