From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
Cc: t-kristo@ti.com, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: OMAP4430 produces boot warnings
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:21:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B4B045.7090603@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B4AA74.1090300@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1056 bytes --]
On 2012-11-27 13:56, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 04:53 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hmm, well this feels like a hack. DISPC driver doesn't know how the DSS
>> modules are arranged, which module belongs to which power domain, etc.
>>
>> If it cannot be fixed in the arch code, I guess we could just have
>> dss_get_ctx_loss_count(void) function which always returns the
>> dss_core's ctx loss count, and define that on all the platforms omapdss
>> is used, the dss_core's ctx loss count is the same as ctx loss count for
>> all the dss submodules.
>>
>> I think the above is true for all OMAPs. But it feels like a hack too,
>> but not as bad as the above patch.
>
> Yes, a function taking in no platform device in dss's core.c would be
> less hacky. I guess we would need this for now, because a solution in
> omap_hwmod would be more complex and it may not be ready by the merge
> window.
Ok. Can you cook up a patch and test it?
PM guys, does the above sound like an acceptable work-around?
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: OMAP4430 produces boot warnings
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:21:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B4B045.7090603@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B4AA74.1090300@ti.com>
On 2012-11-27 13:56, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 04:53 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hmm, well this feels like a hack. DISPC driver doesn't know how the DSS
>> modules are arranged, which module belongs to which power domain, etc.
>>
>> If it cannot be fixed in the arch code, I guess we could just have
>> dss_get_ctx_loss_count(void) function which always returns the
>> dss_core's ctx loss count, and define that on all the platforms omapdss
>> is used, the dss_core's ctx loss count is the same as ctx loss count for
>> all the dss submodules.
>>
>> I think the above is true for all OMAPs. But it feels like a hack too,
>> but not as bad as the above patch.
>
> Yes, a function taking in no platform device in dss's core.c would be
> less hacky. I guess we would need this for now, because a solution in
> omap_hwmod would be more complex and it may not be ready by the merge
> window.
Ok. Can you cook up a patch and test it?
PM guys, does the above sound like an acceptable work-around?
Tomi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121127/3dc952da/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-27 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 23:03 OMAP4430 produces boot warnings Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-21 23:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-22 12:42 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-22 12:42 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-22 13:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-22 13:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-22 14:34 ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-22 14:34 ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-22 14:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-22 14:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-23 9:34 ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-23 9:34 ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-26 6:48 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-26 6:48 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-26 12:14 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-26 12:14 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-27 11:23 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-27 11:23 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-27 11:56 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-27 11:56 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-27 12:21 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-11-27 12:21 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-27 12:31 ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-27 12:31 ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-28 10:44 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-28 10:44 ` Archit Taneja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B4B045.7090603@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.