All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move DISPC specific dss_reg_fields to dispc_features
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:18:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7528C.1090507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5bbbc9af3ef5ca2636d3c4dea6cbbe9834e0f62.1354086150.git.cmahapatra@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1872 bytes --]

On 2012-11-28 12:41, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
> The register fields in dss_reg_fields specific to DISPC are moved from struct
> omap_dss_features to corresponding dispc_reg_fields, initialized in struct
> dispc_features, thereby enabling local access.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c        |   87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h          |    4 ++
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss_features.c |   28 ----------
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss_features.h |    7 ---
>  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> index 9f259ba..21fc522 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,16 @@ struct dispc_irq_stats {
>  	unsigned irqs[32];
>  };
>  
> +enum dispc_feat_reg_field {
> +	FEAT_REG_FIRHINC,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIRVINC,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIFOLOWTHRESHOLD,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE,
> +	FEAT_REG_HORIZONTALACCU,
> +	FEAT_REG_VERTICALACCU,
> +};
> +
>  struct dispc_features {
>  	u8 sw_start;
>  	u8 fp_start;
> @@ -107,6 +117,8 @@ struct dispc_features {
>  
>  	u32 buffer_size_unit;
>  	u32 burst_size_unit;
> +
> +	struct register_field *reg_fields;
>  };

Hmm, would it be simpler to have an explicit struct for the reg fields.
I mean something like:

struct dispc_reg_fields {
	struct register_field firhinc;
	struct register_field firvinc;
	struct register_field fifo_low_threshold;
	...
};

Then accessing it would be

dispc.feat->reg_fields.firhinc.start;

instead of

dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE].start;

Not a big difference, but I don't see any benefit in having an array of
reg fields here.

 Tomi



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move DISPC specific dss_reg_fields to dispc_features
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:18:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7528C.1090507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5bbbc9af3ef5ca2636d3c4dea6cbbe9834e0f62.1354086150.git.cmahapatra@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1872 bytes --]

On 2012-11-28 12:41, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
> The register fields in dss_reg_fields specific to DISPC are moved from struct
> omap_dss_features to corresponding dispc_reg_fields, initialized in struct
> dispc_features, thereby enabling local access.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c        |   87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h          |    4 ++
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss_features.c |   28 ----------
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss_features.h |    7 ---
>  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> index 9f259ba..21fc522 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,16 @@ struct dispc_irq_stats {
>  	unsigned irqs[32];
>  };
>  
> +enum dispc_feat_reg_field {
> +	FEAT_REG_FIRHINC,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIRVINC,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIFOLOWTHRESHOLD,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD,
> +	FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE,
> +	FEAT_REG_HORIZONTALACCU,
> +	FEAT_REG_VERTICALACCU,
> +};
> +
>  struct dispc_features {
>  	u8 sw_start;
>  	u8 fp_start;
> @@ -107,6 +117,8 @@ struct dispc_features {
>  
>  	u32 buffer_size_unit;
>  	u32 burst_size_unit;
> +
> +	struct register_field *reg_fields;
>  };

Hmm, would it be simpler to have an explicit struct for the reg fields.
I mean something like:

struct dispc_reg_fields {
	struct register_field firhinc;
	struct register_field firvinc;
	struct register_field fifo_low_threshold;
	...
};

Then accessing it would be

dispc.feat->reg_fields.firhinc.start;

instead of

dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE].start;

Not a big difference, but I don't see any benefit in having an array of
reg fields here.

 Tomi



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-29 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-28 10:41 [PATCH 0/7] OMAPDSS: Cleanup omap_dss_features Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move burst_size and buffer_size to dispc_features Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-29 12:01   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-29 12:01     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-28 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move DISPC specific dss_reg_fields " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-29 12:05   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-29 12:05     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-30 10:02     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-30 10:14       ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-30 10:25       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-30 10:25         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-29 12:18   ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-11-29 12:18     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-12-03  6:29     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-03  6:41       ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-04  8:16       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-12-04  8:16         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-28 10:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move DISPC specific dss_params " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-29 12:08   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-29 12:08     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-28 10:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] OMAPDSS: DSI: Move DSI specific reg_fields to dsi_feats Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] OMAPDSS: DSI: Move DSI specific dss_params " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] OMAPDSS: DSS: Add members fld_dispc_clk_switch and dss_fck_max Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] OMAPDSS: DSI: Add FEAT_PARAM_DSS_FCK Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-11-28 10:53   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:16 ` [PATCH V2 0/6] OMAPDSS: Cleanup omap_dss_features Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:28   ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:16   ` [PATCH V2 1/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move burst_size and buffer_size to dispc_features Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:28     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:16   ` [PATCH V2 2/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move DISPC specific dss_reg_fields " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:28     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-17 12:37     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-12-17 12:37       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-12-19  9:27       ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-19  9:39         ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:16   ` [PATCH V2 3/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move DISPC specific dss_params " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:28     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:16   ` [PATCH V2 4/6] OMAPDSS: DSI: Move DSI specific reg_fields to dsi_feats Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:28     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-17 12:23     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-12-17 12:23       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-12-19  8:58       ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-19  9:10         ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:16   ` [PATCH V2 5/6] OMAPDSS: DSI: Move DSI specific dss_params " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:28     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:16   ` [PATCH V2 6/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Add members fld_dispc_clk_switch and dss_fck_max Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-12-05 10:28     ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B7528C.1090507@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=cmahapatra@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.