From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org"
<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: moving stuff away from mach/clk.h
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:25:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7A87E.5070302@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B6FCE5.7080003-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 11/28/2012 11:12 PM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 12:29 PM, Sivaram Nair wrote:
>> This patch moves some stuff away from mach/clk.h to other mach-tegra
>> files. This is part of the efforts to get rid of mach/clk.h which in
>> turn will help to enable single zImage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/clock.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/clock.h | 12 ++++++++++--
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/clk.h | 11 -----------
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> This patch will not add any real value since I have removed clk_cfg_ex
> functionality in clock code rework.
> It's just that I will have to rebase my changes on this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
In that case, I may as well not apply patch 2/2 at all, and I'll just
take your clock code cleanup instead. I assume that will be posted for
inclusion into 3.9?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: moving stuff away from mach/clk.h
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:25:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7A87E.5070302@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B6FCE5.7080003@nvidia.com>
On 11/28/2012 11:12 PM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 12:29 PM, Sivaram Nair wrote:
>> This patch moves some stuff away from mach/clk.h to other mach-tegra
>> files. This is part of the efforts to get rid of mach/clk.h which in
>> turn will help to enable single zImage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/clock.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/clock.h | 12 ++++++++++--
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/clk.h | 11 -----------
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> This patch will not add any real value since I have removed clk_cfg_ex
> functionality in clock code rework.
> It's just that I will have to rebase my changes on this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
In that case, I may as well not apply patch 2/2 at all, and I'll just
take your clock code cleanup instead. I assume that will be posted for
inclusion into 3.9?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@nvidia.com>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: moving stuff away from mach/clk.h
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:25:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7A87E.5070302@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B6FCE5.7080003@nvidia.com>
On 11/28/2012 11:12 PM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 12:29 PM, Sivaram Nair wrote:
>> This patch moves some stuff away from mach/clk.h to other mach-tegra
>> files. This is part of the efforts to get rid of mach/clk.h which in
>> turn will help to enable single zImage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/clock.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/clock.h | 12 ++++++++++--
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/clk.h | 11 -----------
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> This patch will not add any real value since I have removed clk_cfg_ex
> functionality in clock code rework.
> It's just that I will have to rebase my changes on this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
In that case, I may as well not apply patch 2/2 at all, and I'll just
take your clock code cleanup instead. I assume that will be posted for
inclusion into 3.9?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-27 6:59 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: remove unused functions in mach/clk.h Sivaram Nair
2012-11-27 6:59 ` Sivaram Nair
2012-11-27 6:59 ` Sivaram Nair
[not found] ` <1353999553-5196-1-git-send-email-sivaramn-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 6:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: moving stuff away from mach/clk.h Sivaram Nair
2012-11-27 6:59 ` Sivaram Nair
2012-11-27 6:59 ` Sivaram Nair
[not found] ` <1353999553-5196-2-git-send-email-sivaramn-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 6:12 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-11-29 6:12 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-11-29 6:12 ` Prashant Gaikwad
[not found] ` <50B6FCE5.7080003-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 18:25 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-11-29 18:25 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-29 18:25 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-30 7:09 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-11-30 7:09 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-11-29 6:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: remove unused functions in mach/clk.h Prashant Gaikwad
2012-11-29 6:20 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-11-29 6:20 ` Prashant Gaikwad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B7A87E.5070302@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren-3lzwwm7+weoh9zmkesr00q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sivaramn-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.