All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-core layer <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: meta-cloud layer
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 09:41:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BA4142.8060409@balister.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADkTA4Nd0-bB2XHT9axsp7xfehcL3swks9q7mMXM+q5oVfDY_g@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/01/2012 09:30 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Michael Halstead
> <michael@yoctoproject.org>wrote:
>
>>   On 11/30/2012 12:17 PM, Raymond Danks wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/2012 11:03 AM, Michael Halstead wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/2012 09:26 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/30/2012 03:29 AM, David Nyström wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/29/2012 02:54 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 06:44 -0700, Raymond Danks wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for looping me in here David. The initial goal for the meta-xen
>>>>>> layer was in fact to encompass Xen Cloud Platform.  As such, the intent
>>>>>> was to contain both hypervisor and user-space applications.  Indeed,
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> xen distribution itself includes xm/libxl; hypervisor abstraction would
>>>>>> be somewhat tedious in my opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The layer just received commits for expanding the libvirt build to
>>>>>> support qemu.  The commonalities and shared packaged between xen, qemu,
>>>>>> and kvm implementations are such that I would also agree that meta-xen
>>>>>> should be expanded/renamed to encompass all virtualization types; I
>>>>>> also
>>>>>> support the move to meta-virtualization.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> meta-virtualization sounds good, let co-op on this so we don't duplicate
>>>> work.
>>>>
>>>>   If everyone is OK with this, I will have Michael Halstead create a
>>> repo, please send him your keys so that you will have write access to it.
>>>
>>
>>   This works for me. If Michael already has our keys, do we need to resend
>> or can
>> a local copy happen ?
>>
>> I already have keys for,
>>
>> David Nystrom df:2d:b1:59:f3:d7:73:fc:59:36:7b:cf:85:28:a7:50
>> Bruce Ashfield  4f:93:90:b2:c7:a1:45:21:f2:47:31:6f:60:f9:60:02
>>
>> Either of you can currently add
>> git@git.yoctoproject.org:meta-virtualization as a git remote and start
>> the repository. Once we have initial code and the maintainers and patch
>> submission guidelines in the readme I can publicly list the new repository.
>>
>> I require an ssh public key for Raymond Danks.
>>
>> Thanks Michael.  I got your response and was able to push meta-xen to the
>> newly created repository on meta-virtualization.  I added one commit to
>> tweak the README and conf/layer.conf for the new name.
>>
>>
>>
>> We also need a short description for the listing on git.yoctoproject.org.
>> I could be something similar to, but better than, "Layer enabling
>> virtualization support. "
>>
>> How about "Layer enabling hypervisor, virtualization tool stack, and cloud
>> support."
>>
>>   Sounds good to me. Thank you.
>>
>>   Also - I referenced the mail alias meta-virtualization at yoctoproject in
>> the README.  When you publish this, can we use something like that as well?
>>
>>   I can add a private list for meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org. Who
>> shall I add to membership?
>>
>>
>
> At the risk of stating the obvious, I like the idea of a separate list, and
> would like to be
> added. But then again, i can always add myself later as well (assuming the
> same
> interface as the rest of the lists).

I also like to track some lists via nntp from gmane.

Philip

>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Halstead
>> Yocto Project / Sys Admin
>>
>>
>>
>>   Thanks again,
>> Ray
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Halstead
>> Yocto Project / Sys Admin
>>
>>
>>
>>   Cheers,
>>
>>   Bruce
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Sau!
>>>
>>>
>>>    As far as a meta-cloud layer is concerned, I'm not sure I am
>>>>>> knowledgeable enough in this area to weigh in.  I'm currently
>>>>>> researching a filesystem implementation for OpenStack and have stumbled
>>>>>> across Ceph/RBD and Gluster modules that look promising. On top of
>>>>>> this,
>>>>>> XCP is documented to include support for VastSky and can be integrated
>>>>>> with DRBD.  And, the storage and hypervisor are only two pieces of the
>>>>>> puzzle for a cloud implementation!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> Cool !
>>>> I know, the meta-"cloud" name is quite/too ambitious, it was not meant
>>>> to be a one week effort. But why aim low :).
>>>>
>>>>   I think I would encourage you to also include OpenStack in a
>>>>>> meta-virtualization layer until it has matured to the point where
>>>>>> abstraction is more warranted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Agree.
>>>>
>>>>   Since you've already created a presence
>>>>>> at github, would it be possible to rename your layer to
>>>>>> meta-virtualization and absorb the entire meta-xen layer?  I can push
>>>>>> any changes for Xen/XCP here, it sounds like it is a central place for
>>>>>> libvirt and could also contain Bruce's kernel modifications.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alternatively, I can create a meta-virtualization project.  In any
>>>>>> case,
>>>>>> those on the To and CC list should receive access to this layer as a
>>>>>> starting point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just my two cents.  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to offer to host this combined layer (whatever we decide to
>>>>> call it) on git.yoctoproject.org if that would help people and people
>>>>> are interested. My only concern is in the area of maintainership, we
>>>>> need to clearly define who maintains what and what the patch submission
>>>>> process is in the README.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good to centralize everything, since Raymond is the majority code
>>>> contributor, perhaps he, if willing, can maintain the
>>>> meta-virtualization layer.
>>>> If you want a co/sub-maintainer I'll be happy to help out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   --
>> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
>> at its end"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>



  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-01 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-28 16:10 meta-cloud layer David Nyström
2012-11-28 16:22 ` Richard Purdie
2012-11-28 17:25   ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-11-29  8:41     ` David Nyström
2012-11-29 10:05       ` Prica, Mihai
2012-11-29 13:44       ` Raymond Danks
2012-11-29 13:54         ` Richard Purdie
2012-11-30 11:29           ` David Nyström
2012-11-30 17:14             ` Raymond Danks
2012-11-30 17:25               ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-11-30 17:15             ` Saul Wold
2012-11-30 17:26               ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-11-30 18:03                 ` Michael Halstead
2012-11-30 20:17                   ` Raymond Danks
2012-11-30 23:23                     ` Michael Halstead
2012-12-01 17:30                       ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-12-01 17:41                         ` Philip Balister [this message]
2012-12-01 20:43                       ` David Nyström
2012-12-03 15:20                         ` Prica, Mihai
2012-12-03 16:00                           ` Saul Wold
2012-12-03 16:04                             ` Michael Halstead
2012-12-03 16:27                               ` Raymond Danks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50BA4142.8060409@balister.org \
    --to=philip@balister.org \
    --cc=bruce.ashfield@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.