From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
software@gaisler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:01:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BE105F.3080403@gaisler.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6sw0zU0NcXw1gjMZka4WyTZgT4heF3r4k0QPHbfcPzbiw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-12-04 15:44, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>> for sparc.
>>
>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>
> They should go through the subsystem trees.
>
> What build testing have you done on these patches?
I have built under sparc32 (leon sparc to be specific) and have
confirmed that of_register_spi_devices and of_i2c_register_devices works
fine.
Cheers,
Andreas
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
software@gaisler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:01:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BE105F.3080403@gaisler.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6sw0zU0NcXw1gjMZka4WyTZgT4heF3r4k0QPHbfcPzbiw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-12-04 15:44, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>> for sparc.
>>
>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>
> They should go through the subsystem trees.
>
> What build testing have you done on these patches?
I have built under sparc32 (leon sparc to be specific) and have
confirmed that of_register_spi_devices and of_i2c_register_devices works
fine.
Cheers,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 14:09 [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi Andreas Larsson
2012-12-04 14:09 ` Andreas Larsson
2012-12-04 14:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] of_i2c: sparc: Allow OF_I2C for sparc Andreas Larsson
2012-12-04 14:09 ` Andreas Larsson
2012-12-07 17:30 ` David Miller
2012-12-07 17:30 ` David Miller
2012-12-04 14:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: sparc: Allow of_register_spi_devices " Andreas Larsson
2012-12-04 14:09 ` Andreas Larsson
2012-12-04 14:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi Grant Likely
2012-12-04 14:44 ` Grant Likely
2012-12-04 15:01 ` Andreas Larsson [this message]
2012-12-04 15:01 ` Andreas Larsson
2012-12-04 21:10 ` David Miller
2012-12-04 21:10 ` David Miller
2012-12-04 21:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-12-04 21:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-12-04 21:49 ` Grant Likely
2012-12-04 21:49 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <CACxGe6t4YcSuh04UjoYqFp355iLa6ECc5G+Y1TP3kxsL48c6jQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-07 17:30 ` David Miller
2012-12-07 17:30 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20121207.123057.2230821059287428618.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-10 22:32 ` Grant Likely
2012-12-10 22:32 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BE105F.3080403@gaisler.com \
--to=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=software@gaisler.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.