From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] net/macb: Use dmapool to align descriptors on 64bits
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 18:18:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BE307E.9090904@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354543290.7030.26.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
On 12/03/2012 03:01 PM, Ben Hutchings :
> On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 13:15 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Depending on datapath, some revisions of GEM need
>> 64bits aligned descriptors. Use dmapool to allocate
>> these descriptors.
>> Note that different size between RX and TX rings
>> leads to the creation of two pools.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> [...]
>
> dma_alloc_coherent() allocates whole pages, which I think is quite
> enough alignment. You can't save memory by doing this, since each pool
> needs at least one page. So what is this change meant to achieve?
Well... I guess we can forget this patch then ;-)
Thanks, best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/macb: Use dmapool to align descriptors on 64bits
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 18:18:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BE307E.9090904@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354543290.7030.26.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
On 12/03/2012 03:01 PM, Ben Hutchings :
> On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 13:15 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Depending on datapath, some revisions of GEM need
>> 64bits aligned descriptors. Use dmapool to allocate
>> these descriptors.
>> Note that different size between RX and TX rings
>> leads to the creation of two pools.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> [...]
>
> dma_alloc_coherent() allocates whole pages, which I think is quite
> enough alignment. You can't save memory by doing this, since each pool
> needs at least one page. So what is this change meant to achieve?
Well... I guess we can forget this patch then ;-)
Thanks, best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-03 12:15 [PATCH] net/macb: Use dmapool to align descriptors on 64bits Nicolas Ferre
2012-12-03 12:15 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-12-03 14:01 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-03 14:01 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-04 17:18 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2012-12-04 17:18 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BE307E.9090904@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.