From: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>
To: Anatoly Muliarski <x86ever@gmail.com>
Cc: Jack Bates <uo4zau@nottheoilrig.com>, netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mark traffic on one machine, match on another machine?
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BF1011.1050709@ngtech.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+4D1sfikOc6BqVpGNxyYUOv-CA9j0ofSf-QJ_Fvz+JSw=SH3w@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Anatoly,
My idea was that based on a mark he will jump the packets to another
table which HE will mark TOS/DSCP.
Eliezer
On 12/5/2012 4:39 AM, Anatoly Muliarski wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> --restore-mark should be used for existing connections and to mark new
> ones you may use something like that:
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0.2 -m tos --tos 1 -m conntrack
> --cstate NEW,RELATED -j MARK --set-mark 1
>
> The main idea consists in marking packets on the physical input
> interface and shaping them on ifb0( where they arrive already marked
> ).
> iptables' packet marks exist only in memory of one computer, TOS/DSCP
> may be used for transmitting a map of them to another one.
> BTW, use --restore-mark on the output interface of your shaper too.
>
> 2012/12/3, Jack Bates <uo4zau@nottheoilrig.com>:
>> Thanks a lot for your help, how can I evaluate --restore-mark before I
>> classify and shape response traffic from the origin server?
>>
>> I think you mean something like:
>>
>> # Copy ctmart to nfmark (e.g. 1, 2)
>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
>>
>> # Classify by nfmark (e.g. 1, 2), send unmarked traffic to class 2:2
>> tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip handle 1 fw flowid
>> 2:1 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>> tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip handle 2 fw flowid
>> 2:3 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>> tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0
>> flowid 2:2 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>>
>> Just how can I get --restore-mark to evaluate before tc filter?
>>
>> Another way I can imagine is with the CLASSIFY target:
>>
>> # Send unmarked traffic to class 2:2
>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -m connmark --mark 1 -j
>> CLASSIFY 2:1
>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -m connmark --mark 2 -j
>> CLASSIFY 2:3
>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -j CLASSIFY 2:2
>>
>> But I have the same challenge, how can I evaluate the CLASSIFY target
>> before I shape traffic?
>>
>> Or is there another way to classify and shape response traffic from the
>> origin server based on the TOS/DSCP field of the request?
>>
>> On 03/12/12 03:52 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>>> You use iptables mark + restore mark based on connection tracking.
>>> you can mark the TOS on the outgoing postrouting table.
>>> you can take a look at the iptabes man pages:
>>> http://ipset.netfilter.org/iptables.man.html
>>> which has --restore-mark exaple.
>>>
>>> Eliezer
>>>
>>> On 12/3/2012 10:43 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>>>> I can imagine a couple ways of classifying traffic from our proxy server
>>>> based on the TOS/DSCP field, and also how to set the connection mark
>>>> based on this field. But how do I classify and shape response traffic
>>>> from the origin server based on the connection mark?
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
sip:ngtech@sip2sip.info
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-05 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-28 5:09 Mark traffic on one machine, match on another machine? Jack Bates
2012-11-28 5:25 ` Steven Kath
2012-11-28 12:54 ` Giles Coochey
2012-11-30 5:41 ` Jack Bates
2012-11-30 6:27 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-12-03 8:43 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-03 11:52 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-12-03 14:32 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-05 2:39 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-05 9:12 ` Eliezer Croitoru [this message]
2012-12-05 14:17 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-06 4:18 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-10 16:18 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-10 20:11 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-12 15:25 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-13 5:06 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-13 5:45 ` Andrew Collins
2012-12-13 20:59 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-13 22:06 ` Andrew Collins
2012-12-14 5:17 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-08 20:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BF1011.1050709@ngtech.co.il \
--to=eliezer@ngtech.co.il \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uo4zau@nottheoilrig.com \
--cc=x86ever@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.