From: Jack Bates <uo4zau@nottheoilrig.com>
To: Anatoly Muliarski <x86ever@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mark traffic on one machine, match on another machine?
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:18:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C60B48.70003@nottheoilrig.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+4D1sdBSzM6QKH1xrgXsG3SS1Quu63omvJtGPDyt1b1gDgiiA@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for this clarification, and your assumptions are correct: I'm
trying to prioritize incoming and outgoing traffic on eth0.2, ifb0 is
for shaping the incoming traffic.
But I'm still failing to filter incoming traffic based on the restored
mark: statistics on the ifb0 qdiscs and classes remain zero. Filtering
outgoing traffic is working as expected, statistics on the eth0.2
classes are incrementing as expected, which I think means that the
PREROUTING --restore-mark target is working?
Do you have any other suggestions how to investigate why incoming
traffic isn't getting filtered? or is there another way to classify
response traffic from the origin server based on the TOS/DSCP field of
the request from the proxy server? Are there any more details that would
help explain the problem?
Here is the clarified script:
1: iptables -N NEW_CONN -t mangle
2: iptables -A NEW_CONN -t mangle -m tos --tos 12 -j MARK --set-mark 1
3: iptables -A NEW_CONN -t mangle -m tos --tos 28 -j MARK --set-mark 2
4: iptables -A NEW_CONN -t mangle -m mark --mark 0 -j MARK --set-mark 3
5: iptables -A NEW_CONN -t mangle -j CONNMARK --save-mark
6:
7: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID
-j DROP
8: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -m conntrack --ctstate
ESTABLISHED -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
9: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -m conntrack --ctstate
NEW,RELATED -j NEW_CONN
10:
11: ifconfig ifb0 up
12:
13: insmod sch_ingress
14: tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 ingress
15:
16: # Classify response traffic from origin server based on restored mark
17: insmod cls_fw
18: insmod act_mirred
19: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 1 handle 1
fw flowid 2:1 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
20: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 1 handle 2
fw flowid 2:3 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
21: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 1 handle 3
fw flowid 2:2 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
22:
23: # Limit up and downstream to 1mbit, to "own" the queue
24: insmod sch_tbf
25: tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 root handle 1 tbf rate 1mbit burst 5k
latency 70ms
26: tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1 tbf rate 1mbit burst 5k
latency 70ms
27:
28: # High, low, and "other" priority
29: insmod sch_prio
30: tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 parent 1: handle 2 prio
31: tc qdisc add dev ifb0 parent 1: handle 2 prio
32:
33: # Classify request traffic from proxy server based on mark
34: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 handle 1 fw
flowid :1
35: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 handle 2 fw
flowid :3
36: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 handle 3 fw
flowid :2
On 05/12/12 08:18 PM, Anatoly Muliarski wrote:
> IMHO, there is a bit of mess in your scheme.
> Let's clarify it :)
>
> If my assumptions are right then:
> 1. eth0.2 is the external shaper interface.
> 2. ifb0 is using for shaping incoming traffic on this interface.
>
> To set marks for the traffic you should use something like these:
>
> iptables -t manlge -N NEW_CONN
> iptables -t mangle -A NEW_CONN -m tos --tos 12 -j MARK --set-mark 1
> iptables -t mangle -A NEW_CONN -m tos --tos 28 -j MARK --set-mark 2
> # to mark all the unmatched traffic and treat it separately in your shaper
> iptables -t mangle -A NEW_CONN -m mark --mark 0 -j MARK --set-mark 3
> iptables -t mangle -A NEW_CONN -j CONNMARK --save-mark
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m conntrack --cstate INVALID -j DROP
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m conntrack --cstate ESTABLISHED -j
> CONNMARK --restore-mark
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m conntrack --cstate NEW,RELATED -g NEW_CONN
>
>
> 2012/12/5, Jack Bates <uo4zau@nottheoilrig.com>:
>> Thanks for this help, I think the marks are getting saved/restored
>> successfully, and I can successfully classify request traffic from the
>> proxy server based on the mark (statistics on the eth0.2 classes are
>> incrementing) but response traffic from the origin server isn't getting
>> classified yet (statistics on the ifb0 classes remain zero).
>>
>> Here is my complete work in progress script. How can I investigate why
>> response traffic isn't getting classified? Are there any more details
>> that would help explain why not?
>>
>> How can I classify traffic based on the restored mark? or is there
>> another way to classify response traffic from the origin server based on
>> the TOS/DSCP field of the request?
>>
>> 1: # Save/restore connection mark based on TOS field
>> 2: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
>> 3: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -m tos --tos 12 -j MARK --set-mark
>> 1
>> 4: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -m tos --tos 28 -j MARK --set-mark
>> 2
>> 5: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -j CONNMARK --save-mark
>> 6:
>> 7: ifconfig ifb0 up
>> 8:
>> 9: insmod sch_ingress
>> 10: tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 ingress
>> 11:
>> 12: # Classify response traffic from origin server based on restored
>> mark
>> 13: insmod cls_fw
>> 14: insmod act_mirred
>> 15: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 1 handle 1
>> fw flowid 2:1 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>> 16: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 1 handle 2
>> fw flowid 2:3 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>> 17:
>> 18: # Send unmarked traffic to class 2:2
>> 19: insmod cls_u32
>> 20: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 1 u32
>> match u32 0 0 flowid 2:2 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>> 21:
>> 22: # Limit up and downstream to 1mbit, to "own" the queue
>> 23: insmod sch_tbf
>> 24: tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 root handle 1 tbf rate 1mbit burst 5k
>> latency 70ms
>> 25: tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1 tbf rate 1mbit burst 5k
>> latency 70ms
>> 26:
>> 27: # High, low, and "other" priority
>> 28: insmod sch_prio
>> 29: tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 parent 1: handle 2 prio
>> 30: tc qdisc add dev ifb0 parent 1: handle 2 prio
>> 31:
>> 32: # Classify request traffic from proxy server based on mark
>> 33: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 handle 1 fw
>> flowid :1
>> 34: tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 handle 2 fw
>> flowid :3
>>
>> On 05/12/12 01:12 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>>> Thanks Anatoly,
>>>
>>> My idea was that based on a mark he will jump the packets to another
>>> table which HE will mark TOS/DSCP.
>>>
>>> Eliezer
>>>
>>> On 12/5/2012 4:39 AM, Anatoly Muliarski wrote:
>>>> Hi Jack,
>>>>
>>>> --restore-mark should be used for existing connections and to mark new
>>>> ones you may use something like that:
>>>>
>>>> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0.2 -m tos --tos 1 -m conntrack
>>>> --cstate NEW,RELATED -j MARK --set-mark 1
>>>>
>>>> The main idea consists in marking packets on the physical input
>>>> interface and shaping them on ifb0( where they arrive already marked
>>>> ).
>>>> iptables' packet marks exist only in memory of one computer, TOS/DSCP
>>>> may be used for transmitting a map of them to another one.
>>>> BTW, use --restore-mark on the output interface of your shaper too.
>>>>
>>>> 2012/12/3, Jack Bates <uo4zau@nottheoilrig.com>:
>>>>> Thanks a lot for your help, how can I evaluate --restore-mark before I
>>>>> classify and shape response traffic from the origin server?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you mean something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> # Copy ctmart to nfmark (e.g. 1, 2)
>>>>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -j CONNMARK
>>>>> --restore-mark
>>>>>
>>>>> # Classify by nfmark (e.g. 1, 2), send unmarked traffic to class
>>>>> 2:2
>>>>> tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip handle 1 fw
>>>>> flowid
>>>>> 2:1 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>>>>> tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip handle 2 fw
>>>>> flowid
>>>>> 2:3 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>>>>> tc filter add dev eth0.2 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0
>>>>> flowid 2:2 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
>>>>>
>>>>> Just how can I get --restore-mark to evaluate before tc filter?
>>>>>
>>>>> Another way I can imagine is with the CLASSIFY target:
>>>>>
>>>>> # Send unmarked traffic to class 2:2
>>>>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -m connmark --mark 1 -j
>>>>> CLASSIFY 2:1
>>>>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -m connmark --mark 2 -j
>>>>> CLASSIFY 2:3
>>>>> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0.2 -j CLASSIFY 2:2
>>>>>
>>>>> But I have the same challenge, how can I evaluate the CLASSIFY target
>>>>> before I shape traffic?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or is there another way to classify and shape response traffic from the
>>>>> origin server based on the TOS/DSCP field of the request?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/12/12 03:52 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>>>>>> You use iptables mark + restore mark based on connection tracking.
>>>>>> you can mark the TOS on the outgoing postrouting table.
>>>>>> you can take a look at the iptabes man pages:
>>>>>> http://ipset.netfilter.org/iptables.man.html
>>>>>> which has --restore-mark exaple.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eliezer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/3/2012 10:43 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>>>>>>> I can imagine a couple ways of classifying traffic from our proxy
>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>> based on the TOS/DSCP field, and also how to set the connection mark
>>>>>>> based on this field. But how do I classify and shape response traffic
>>>>>>> from the origin server based on the connection mark?
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-10 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-28 5:09 Mark traffic on one machine, match on another machine? Jack Bates
2012-11-28 5:25 ` Steven Kath
2012-11-28 12:54 ` Giles Coochey
2012-11-30 5:41 ` Jack Bates
2012-11-30 6:27 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-12-03 8:43 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-03 11:52 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-12-03 14:32 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-05 2:39 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-05 9:12 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-12-05 14:17 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-06 4:18 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-10 16:18 ` Jack Bates [this message]
2012-12-10 20:11 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-12 15:25 ` Jack Bates
2012-12-13 5:06 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-13 5:45 ` Andrew Collins
2012-12-13 20:59 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-13 22:06 ` Andrew Collins
2012-12-14 5:17 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2012-12-08 20:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C60B48.70003@nottheoilrig.com \
--to=uo4zau@nottheoilrig.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86ever@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.