From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Check BITS_PER_LONG instead of __SIZEOF_LONG__
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:17:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C0EF2C.3080705@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354821137-7562-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
On 12/06/2012 11:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When building a 32-bit kernel for RBTX4927 with gcc version 4.1.2 20061115
> (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-21), I get:
>
> arch/mips/lib/delay.c:24:5: warning: "__SIZEOF_LONG__" is not defined
>
> As a consequence, __delay() always uses the 64-bit "dsubu" instruction.
>
> Replace the check for "__SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4" by "BITS_PER_LONG == 32" to
> fix this.
>
> Introduced by commit 5210edcd527773c227465ad18e416a894966324f ("MIPS: Make
> __{,n,u}delay declarations match definitions and generic delay.h")
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> --
> Untested on real hardware.
> Ralf, is this sufficient to prevent you from nuking RBTX4927 support? ;-)
> ---
> arch/mips/lib/delay.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
> index dc81ca8..288f795 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
> " .set noreorder \n"
> " .align 3 \n"
> "1: bnez %0, 1b \n"
> -#if __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> " subu %0, 1 \n"
> #else
> " dsubu %0, 1 \n"
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Check BITS_PER_LONG instead of __SIZEOF_LONG__
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:17:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C0EF2C.3080705@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20121206191700.jJwgsjgEVJ4djTkQx3cpn2K51Rl3r6AWiRbfYv73VCs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354821137-7562-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
On 12/06/2012 11:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When building a 32-bit kernel for RBTX4927 with gcc version 4.1.2 20061115
> (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-21), I get:
>
> arch/mips/lib/delay.c:24:5: warning: "__SIZEOF_LONG__" is not defined
>
> As a consequence, __delay() always uses the 64-bit "dsubu" instruction.
>
> Replace the check for "__SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4" by "BITS_PER_LONG == 32" to
> fix this.
>
> Introduced by commit 5210edcd527773c227465ad18e416a894966324f ("MIPS: Make
> __{,n,u}delay declarations match definitions and generic delay.h")
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> --
> Untested on real hardware.
> Ralf, is this sufficient to prevent you from nuking RBTX4927 support? ;-)
> ---
> arch/mips/lib/delay.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
> index dc81ca8..288f795 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
> " .set noreorder \n"
> " .align 3 \n"
> "1: bnez %0, 1b \n"
> -#if __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> " subu %0, 1 \n"
> #else
> " dsubu %0, 1 \n"
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-06 19:12 [PATCH] MIPS: Check BITS_PER_LONG instead of __SIZEOF_LONG__ Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-12-06 19:17 ` David Daney [this message]
2012-12-06 19:17 ` David Daney
2012-12-06 23:46 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C0EF2C.3080705@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.