From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, WuJianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>,
Liujiang <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
andi@firstfloor.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MCE: fix an error of mce_bad_pages statistics
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:35:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C19C33.9030502@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121207072541.GA27708@liondog.tnic>
On 2012/12/7 15:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:53:41AM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> On x86 platform, if we use "/sys/devices/system/memory/soft_offline_page" to offline a
>> free page twice, the value of mce_bad_pages will be added twice. So this is an error,
>> since the page was already marked HWPoison, we should skip the page and don't add the
>> value of mce_bad_pages.
>>
>> $ cat /proc/meminfo | grep HardwareCorrupted
>>
>> soft_offline_page()
>> get_any_page()
>> atomic_long_add(1, &mce_bad_pages)
>>
>> The free page which marked HWPoison is still managed by page buddy allocator. So when
>> offlining it again, get_any_page() always returns 0 with
>> "pr_info("%s: %#lx free buddy page\n", __func__, pfn);".
>>
>> When page is allocated, the PageBuddy is removed in bad_page(), then get_any_page()
>> returns -EIO with pr_info("%s: %#lx: unknown zero refcount page type %lx\n", so
>> mce_bad_pages will not be added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
>> i>>?Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/memory-failure.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index 8b20278..02a522e 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -1375,6 +1375,11 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>> if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
>> return 1;
>>
>> + if (PageHWPoison(p)) {
>> + pr_info("%s: %#lx page already poisoned\n", __func__, pfn);
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>
> Shouldn't this be done in soft_offline_page() instead, like it is done
> in soft_offline_huge_page() for hugepages?
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Borislav, you mean we should move this to the beginning of soft_offline_page()?
soft_offline_page()
{
...
get_any_page()
...
/*
* Synchronized using the page lock with memory_failure()
*/
if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
unlock_page(page);
put_page(page);
pr_info("soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned\n", pfn);
return -EBUSY;
}
...
}
Thanks
Xishi Qiu
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, WuJianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>,
Liujiang <jiang.liu@huawei.com>, <andi@firstfloor.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MCE: fix an error of mce_bad_pages statistics
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:35:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C19C33.9030502@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121207072541.GA27708@liondog.tnic>
On 2012/12/7 15:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:53:41AM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> On x86 platform, if we use "/sys/devices/system/memory/soft_offline_page" to offline a
>> free page twice, the value of mce_bad_pages will be added twice. So this is an error,
>> since the page was already marked HWPoison, we should skip the page and don't add the
>> value of mce_bad_pages.
>>
>> $ cat /proc/meminfo | grep HardwareCorrupted
>>
>> soft_offline_page()
>> get_any_page()
>> atomic_long_add(1, &mce_bad_pages)
>>
>> The free page which marked HWPoison is still managed by page buddy allocator. So when
>> offlining it again, get_any_page() always returns 0 with
>> "pr_info("%s: %#lx free buddy page\n", __func__, pfn);".
>>
>> When page is allocated, the PageBuddy is removed in bad_page(), then get_any_page()
>> returns -EIO with pr_info("%s: %#lx: unknown zero refcount page type %lx\n", so
>> mce_bad_pages will not be added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/memory-failure.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index 8b20278..02a522e 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -1375,6 +1375,11 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>> if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
>> return 1;
>>
>> + if (PageHWPoison(p)) {
>> + pr_info("%s: %#lx page already poisoned\n", __func__, pfn);
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>
> Shouldn't this be done in soft_offline_page() instead, like it is done
> in soft_offline_huge_page() for hugepages?
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Borislav, you mean we should move this to the beginning of soft_offline_page()?
soft_offline_page()
{
...
get_any_page()
...
/*
* Synchronized using the page lock with memory_failure()
*/
if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
unlock_page(page);
put_page(page);
pr_info("soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned\n", pfn);
return -EBUSY;
}
...
}
Thanks
Xishi Qiu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-07 2:53 [PATCH] MCE: fix an error of mce_bad_pages statistics Xishi Qiu
2012-12-07 2:53 ` Xishi Qiu
2012-12-07 7:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-07 7:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-07 7:35 ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2012-12-07 7:35 ` Xishi Qiu
2012-12-07 7:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-07 7:46 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C19C33.9030502@huawei.com \
--to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.