From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH v6 1/4] pinctrl: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:23:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CEF298.3070508@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121217093947.GG23971@game.jcrosoft.org>
On 12/17/2012 10:39 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 11:24 Wed 21 Nov , Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:17:09AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>>> Add pinctrl support for atmel ssc peripheral
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>
> you handle this one with scc
Hold on Jean-Christophe, I made a little experiment this morning, and
this patch is not applying correctly on:
- linus' tree
- linux-next
- neither Mark's for-next branch
So, *I* will manage this patch and try to make sure that Mark is able to
seamlessly include it in his tree on top of a known source for a future
ASoC "fixes" pull-request.
Mark, what about rebasing this one on top of current Linus' tree
(toguether with the one that you have just applied on the topic/atmel
branch: (ASoC: atmel-ssc: change disable to disable in dts node)?
I hope that once reworked, they will be able to reach Linus' tree soon
because the lack of this patch is causing DTB compilation errors on all
AT91...
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH v6 1/4] pinctrl: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:23:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CEF298.3070508@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121217093947.GG23971@game.jcrosoft.org>
On 12/17/2012 10:39 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 11:24 Wed 21 Nov , Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:17:09AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>>> Add pinctrl support for atmel ssc peripheral
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>
> you handle this one with scc
Hold on Jean-Christophe, I made a little experiment this morning, and
this patch is not applying correctly on:
- linus' tree
- linux-next
- neither Mark's for-next branch
So, *I* will manage this patch and try to make sure that Mark is able to
seamlessly include it in his tree on top of a known source for a future
ASoC "fixes" pull-request.
Mark, what about rebasing this one on top of current Linus' tree
(toguether with the one that you have just applied on the topic/atmel
branch: (ASoC: atmel-ssc: change disable to disable in dts node)?
I hope that once reworked, they will be able to reach Linus' tree soon
because the lack of this patch is causing DTB compilation errors on all
AT91...
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Resend PATCH v6 1/4] pinctrl: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:23:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CEF298.3070508@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121217093947.GG23971@game.jcrosoft.org>
On 12/17/2012 10:39 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 11:24 Wed 21 Nov , Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:17:09AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>>> Add pinctrl support for atmel ssc peripheral
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>
> you handle this one with scc
Hold on Jean-Christophe, I made a little experiment this morning, and
this patch is not applying correctly on:
- linus' tree
- linux-next
- neither Mark's for-next branch
So, *I* will manage this patch and try to make sure that Mark is able to
seamlessly include it in his tree on top of a known source for a future
ASoC "fixes" pull-request.
Mark, what about rebasing this one on top of current Linus' tree
(toguether with the one that you have just applied on the topic/atmel
branch: (ASoC: atmel-ssc: change disable to disable in dts node)?
I hope that once reworked, they will be able to reach Linus' tree soon
because the lack of this patch is causing DTB compilation errors on all
AT91...
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-17 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 2:17 [Resend PATCH v6 1/4] pinctrl: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support Bo Shen
2012-11-21 2:17 ` Bo Shen
2012-11-21 2:17 ` Bo Shen
2012-11-21 2:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-21 2:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-21 2:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-12-03 5:56 ` Bo Shen
2012-12-03 5:56 ` Bo Shen
2012-12-03 5:56 ` Bo Shen
2012-12-13 2:10 ` Bo Shen
2012-12-13 2:10 ` Bo Shen
2012-12-13 2:10 ` Bo Shen
2012-12-17 9:39 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-17 9:39 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-17 9:39 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-17 10:23 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2012-12-17 10:23 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-12-17 10:23 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-12-17 11:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-12-17 11:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-12-17 11:24 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50CEF298.3070508@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=voice.shen@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.