From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] Input: twl6040-vibra: Code cleanup in probe with devm_* conversion
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:11:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EFD728.8090204@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130110175421.GC2797@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Hi Dmitry,
On 01/10/2013 06:54 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:36:05PM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Convert the probe to use devm_*. At the same time reorder the calls
>> so we will register the input device as the last step when the driver
>> is loaded.
>
> If you are doing this please also use devm_input_allocate_device() and
> devm_regulator_bulk_get().
Now I remember: I can not switch to devm_regulator_bulk_get() unfortunately
since when we boot with DT the code needs to reach up for the parent's dev to
get the needed regulator. If I use devm_regulator_bulk_get() the resource will
be bind to the parent dev and not to the vibra driver.
> I also think it is high time to get rid of
> dedicated work queue - cwq hasn't actually given you a separate therad
> for a while now and if you get rid of workqueue you can get ridof entire
> twl6040_vibra_remove().
I agree with the rest. I'll move both twl4030/6040 vibra to use
devm_input_allocate_device() and also I will move them to use system wide
workqueue.
I'm going to resend the series soon with the suggested changes.
Thanks,
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] Input: twl6040-vibra: Code cleanup in probe with devm_* conversion
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:11:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EFD728.8090204@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130110175421.GC2797@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Hi Dmitry,
On 01/10/2013 06:54 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:36:05PM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Convert the probe to use devm_*. At the same time reorder the calls
>> so we will register the input device as the last step when the driver
>> is loaded.
>
> If you are doing this please also use devm_input_allocate_device() and
> devm_regulator_bulk_get().
Now I remember: I can not switch to devm_regulator_bulk_get() unfortunately
since when we boot with DT the code needs to reach up for the parent's dev to
get the needed regulator. If I use devm_regulator_bulk_get() the resource will
be bind to the parent dev and not to the vibra driver.
> I also think it is high time to get rid of
> dedicated work queue - cwq hasn't actually given you a separate therad
> for a while now and if you get rid of workqueue you can get ridof entire
> twl6040_vibra_remove().
I agree with the rest. I'll move both twl4030/6040 vibra to use
devm_input_allocate_device() and also I will move them to use system wide
workqueue.
I'm going to resend the series soon with the suggested changes.
Thanks,
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-11 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-10 13:36 [PATCH resend 0/2] Input: twl*-vibra probe cleanups (devm_* conversion) Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-10 13:36 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-10 13:36 ` [PATCH resend 1/2] Input: twl4030-vibra: Convert to use devm_* in probe Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-10 13:36 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-10 13:36 ` [PATCH resend 2/2] Input: twl6040-vibra: Code cleanup in probe with devm_* conversion Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-10 13:36 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-10 17:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-01-11 9:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2013-01-11 9:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EFD728.8090204@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.