From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] slightly change shrinker behaviour for very small object sets
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:58:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F4636C.6030908@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1356086810-6950-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
On 12/21/2012 02:46 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * v2: fix sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure for all users.
>
> I've recently noticed some glitches in the object shrinker mechanism when a
> very small number of objects is used. Those situations are theoretically
> possible, albeit unlikely. But although it may feel like it is purely
> theoretical, they can become common in environments with many small containers
> (cgroups) in a box.
>
> Those patches came from some experimentation I am doing with targetted-shrinking
> for kmem-limited memory cgroups (Dave Shrinnker is already aware of such work).
> In such scenarios, one can set the available memory to very low limits, and it
> becomes easy to see this.
>
>
Hi,
Who should pick this one up?
Are there any comments aside from Dave's Reviewed-by tag that I wrongly
transcribed?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] slightly change shrinker behaviour for very small object sets
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:58:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F4636C.6030908@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1356086810-6950-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
On 12/21/2012 02:46 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * v2: fix sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure for all users.
>
> I've recently noticed some glitches in the object shrinker mechanism when a
> very small number of objects is used. Those situations are theoretically
> possible, albeit unlikely. But although it may feel like it is purely
> theoretical, they can become common in environments with many small containers
> (cgroups) in a box.
>
> Those patches came from some experimentation I am doing with targetted-shrinking
> for kmem-limited memory cgroups (Dave Shrinnker is already aware of such work).
> In such scenarios, one can set the available memory to very low limits, and it
> becomes easy to see this.
>
>
Hi,
Who should pick this one up?
Are there any comments aside from Dave's Reviewed-by tag that I wrongly
transcribed?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-14 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-21 10:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] slightly change shrinker behaviour for very small object sets Glauber Costa
2012-12-21 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-21 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-21 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2012-12-21 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-21 11:08 ` Carlos Maiolino
2012-12-21 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2012-12-21 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-21 11:10 ` Carlos Maiolino
2012-12-22 23:53 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-22 23:53 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-22 23:56 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-22 23:56 ` Glauber Costa
2012-12-22 23:56 ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-14 19:58 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-01-14 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] slightly change shrinker behaviour for very small object sets Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F4636C.6030908@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.