All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
To: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:32:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F62D69.8080100@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358308153.32106.8.camel@gitbox>

On 01/15/2013 08:49 PM, Tony Prisk wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:14 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the tegra tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/clocksource/Makefile between commit ff7ec345f0ec ("timer: vt8500:
>> Move timer code to drivers/clocksource") from the arm-soc tree and commit
>> ac0fd9eca3ba ("ARM: tegra: move timer.c to drivers/clocksource/") from
>> the tegra tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> is required).
>>
> 
> I don't know about everyone else, but I feel the preference should be to
> keep things alphabetized where possible to help avoid with merge
> conflicts later on. This is always a problem when we start tacking
> things on the end of lists.
> 
> I realise this Kconfig is not alphabetized anyway, but it's never too
> early to start on the 'right' path.

Sounds like a good idea, but the issue is: When to do the initial sort
so it doesn't conflict with all the adds in a kernel cycle... Post and
immediately commit a new patch near the end of the merge window?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@nvidia.com (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:32:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F62D69.8080100@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358308153.32106.8.camel@gitbox>

On 01/15/2013 08:49 PM, Tony Prisk wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:14 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the tegra tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/clocksource/Makefile between commit ff7ec345f0ec ("timer: vt8500:
>> Move timer code to drivers/clocksource") from the arm-soc tree and commit
>> ac0fd9eca3ba ("ARM: tegra: move timer.c to drivers/clocksource/") from
>> the tegra tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> is required).
>>
> 
> I don't know about everyone else, but I feel the preference should be to
> keep things alphabetized where possible to help avoid with merge
> conflicts later on. This is always a problem when we start tacking
> things on the end of lists.
> 
> I realise this Kconfig is not alphabetized anyway, but it's never too
> early to start on the 'right' path.

Sounds like a good idea, but the issue is: When to do the initial sort
so it doesn't conflict with all the adds in a kernel cycle... Post and
immediately commit a new patch near the end of the merge window?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-16  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-16  3:14 linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:49 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-16  3:49   ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-16  4:32   ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-01-16  4:32     ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16  4:52     ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-16  4:52       ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-16 16:27       ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-16 16:27         ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-16 17:08         ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16 17:08           ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16 17:35           ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-16 17:35             ` Olof Johansson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-06 13:13 Mark Brown
2020-07-19 23:04 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-19 23:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-26 22:27 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-26 22:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-27 13:18 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-27 13:18   ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-27 13:50   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-27 13:50     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-25  0:12 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-25  0:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-02 11:46 Mark Brown
2015-12-02 11:46 ` Mark Brown
2013-03-18  4:31 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-18  4:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-18  4:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-18 15:23 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-18 15:23   ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-18 15:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-18 15:49     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-02 11:52 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-02 11:45 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:30 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:10 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:12   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:12   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F62D69.8080100@nvidia.com \
    --to=swarren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@prisktech.co.nz \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.