From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] reset: Add reset controller API
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:15:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F7267E.8090309@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358352787-15441-3-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
On 01/16/2013 09:13 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> This adds a simple API for devices to request being reset
> by separate reset controller hardware and implements the
> reset signal device tree binding.
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/Makefile b/drivers/reset/Makefile
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER) += core.o
> +
nit: blank line at EOF.
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> +/**
> + * reset_control_reset - reset the controlled device
> + * @rstc: reset controller
> + */
> +int reset_control_reset(struct reset_control *rstc)
What time period is the reset signal asserted for; should there be a
parameter to control this?
> +{
> + if (rstc->rcdev->ops->reset)
> + return rstc->rcdev->ops->reset(rstc->id);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
If there's no op, shouldn't the function fail?
> +/**
> + * reset_control_is_asserted - deasserts the reset line
Comment seems wrong.
Is this API useful; why wouldn't drivers just assert to de-assert it
based on their needs?
> +/**
> + * reset_control_get - Lookup and obtain a reference to a reset controller.
> + * @dev: device to be reset by the controller
> + * @id: reset line name
> + *
> + * Returns a struct reset_control or IS_ERR() condition containing errno.
OK, so NULL can't ever (legally) be returned.
> +struct reset_control *reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> + rcdev_node = NULL;
> + for (i = 0; rcdev_node == NULL; i++) {
...
> + rcdev_node = args.np;
> + rcdev_index = args.args[0];
Even though the loop condition tests rcdev_node, it'd be a lot easier to
realize that the loop bails out here because of that if you explicitly
wrote a break; here. Otherwise, it took a while for me to realize.
> +void reset_control_put(struct reset_control *rstc)
> +{
> + if (rstc == NULL || IS_ERR(rstc))
> + return;
... so (re: two comments above) you don't need to check for NULL here;
if someone passes NULL in here, they're passing some value that
reset_control_get() never passed back, so this API is free to do
whatever it wants...
> + kfree(rstc);
> + module_put(rstc->rcdev->owner);
You need to module_put() first, or copy rstc->rcdev, since otherwise
you're reading *rstc after it's freed.
This implementation only supports device tree. People might want the
APIs to work on non-device-tree systems too, although I guess that
should be easy enough to retrofit without changing the driver-visible API...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>,
Fabio Estevam
<fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Mike Turquette
<mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] reset: Add reset controller API
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:15:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F7267E.8090309@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358352787-15441-3-git-send-email-p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
On 01/16/2013 09:13 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> This adds a simple API for devices to request being reset
> by separate reset controller hardware and implements the
> reset signal device tree binding.
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/Makefile b/drivers/reset/Makefile
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER) += core.o
> +
nit: blank line at EOF.
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> +/**
> + * reset_control_reset - reset the controlled device
> + * @rstc: reset controller
> + */
> +int reset_control_reset(struct reset_control *rstc)
What time period is the reset signal asserted for; should there be a
parameter to control this?
> +{
> + if (rstc->rcdev->ops->reset)
> + return rstc->rcdev->ops->reset(rstc->id);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
If there's no op, shouldn't the function fail?
> +/**
> + * reset_control_is_asserted - deasserts the reset line
Comment seems wrong.
Is this API useful; why wouldn't drivers just assert to de-assert it
based on their needs?
> +/**
> + * reset_control_get - Lookup and obtain a reference to a reset controller.
> + * @dev: device to be reset by the controller
> + * @id: reset line name
> + *
> + * Returns a struct reset_control or IS_ERR() condition containing errno.
OK, so NULL can't ever (legally) be returned.
> +struct reset_control *reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> + rcdev_node = NULL;
> + for (i = 0; rcdev_node == NULL; i++) {
...
> + rcdev_node = args.np;
> + rcdev_index = args.args[0];
Even though the loop condition tests rcdev_node, it'd be a lot easier to
realize that the loop bails out here because of that if you explicitly
wrote a break; here. Otherwise, it took a while for me to realize.
> +void reset_control_put(struct reset_control *rstc)
> +{
> + if (rstc == NULL || IS_ERR(rstc))
> + return;
... so (re: two comments above) you don't need to check for NULL here;
if someone passes NULL in here, they're passing some value that
reset_control_get() never passed back, so this API is free to do
whatever it wants...
> + kfree(rstc);
> + module_put(rstc->rcdev->owner);
You need to module_put() first, or copy rstc->rcdev, since otherwise
you're reading *rstc after it's freed.
This implementation only supports device tree. People might want the
APIs to work on non-device-tree systems too, although I guess that
should be easy enough to retrofit without changing the driver-visible API...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-16 16:13 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reset controller API to reset IP modules on i.MX5 and i.MX6 Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/7] dt: describe base reset signal binding Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 22:06 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16 22:06 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] reset: Add reset controller API Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 20:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-16 20:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-16 22:15 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-01-16 22:15 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-17 10:45 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-17 10:45 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-17 16:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-17 16:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-17 5:16 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-17 5:16 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-16 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM i.MX6q: Add GPU, VPU, IPU, and OpenVG resets to System Reset Controller (SRC) Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-17 5:31 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-17 5:31 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-18 19:57 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-18 19:57 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 9:52 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-21 9:52 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-21 17:47 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 17:47 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-22 7:50 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-22 7:50 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-16 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM i.MX6q: Link system reset controller (SRC) to IPU in DT Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-17 5:34 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-17 5:34 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-16 16:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] staging: drm/imx: Use SRC to reset IPU Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM i.MX5: Add System Reset Controller (SRC) support for i.MX51 and i.MX53 Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-17 6:12 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-17 6:12 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-17 10:45 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-17 10:45 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM i.MX5: Add system reset controller (SRC) to i.MX51 and i.MX53 device tree Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 16:13 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 22:19 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16 22:19 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-17 6:37 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-17 6:37 ` Shawn Guo
2013-01-17 10:45 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-17 10:45 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-16 18:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reset controller API to reset IP modules on i.MX5 and i.MX6 Marek Vasut
2013-01-16 18:46 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F7267E.8090309@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.