From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] rbd: encapsulate handling for a single request
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:01:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F866AD.4030802@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F5EA25.2070303@inktank.com>
On 01/15/2013 05:45 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 02:43 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>> In rbd_rq_fn(), requests are fetched from the block layer and each
>> request is processed, looping through the request's list of bio's
>> until they've all been consumed.
>>
>> Separate the handling for a single request into its own function to
>> make it a bit easier to see what's going on.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
>> ---
. . .
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> -
>> + result = rbd_dev_do_request(rq, rbd_dev, snapc, ofs, size, bio);
>> ceph_put_snap_context(snapc);
>> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + if (result < 0)
>
> result may be 0 if num_segs == 0, which will make the request hang.
> I'm not sure if this will happen (or is even possible), but it's
> different from the previous behavior, which called
> __blk_end_request_all() in this case as well.
You're right. And I think there may be some valid special
zero-length requests (like cache flush requests or something).
The value of num_segs comes from rbd_get_num_segments(). The
only way that will ever return 0 is if the len it is provided
is 0.
So my fix will be to change the check after the spin_lock_irq()
call from this:
if (result < 0)
to this:
if (!size || result < 0)
I'll re-post the result shortly.
-Alex
>> + __blk_end_request_all(rq, result);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 22:42 [PATCH REPOST 0/2] rbd: simplify rbd_rq_fn() Alex Elder
2013-01-03 22:43 ` [PATCH REPOST 1/2] rbd: encapsulate handling for a single request Alex Elder
2013-01-15 23:45 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-17 21:01 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2013-01-17 21:04 ` [PATCH, v2] " Alex Elder
2013-01-17 21:30 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-03 22:43 ` [PATCH REPOST 2/2] rbd: a little more cleanup of rbd_rq_fn() Alex Elder
2013-01-16 0:02 ` Josh Durgin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F866AD.4030802@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.