From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] virtio-net: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:23:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F8EA61.4040900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358487121-7956-2-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 01/18/2013 01:32 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> Add a cpu notifier to virtio-net, so that we can reset the
> virtqueue affinity if the cpu hotplug happens. It improve
> the performance through enabling or disabling the virtqueue
> affinity after doing cpu hotplug.
>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>
> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> V4->V5:
> New method to deal with the cpu hotplug actions (Rusty)
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 440b0eb..061f2c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>
> static int napi_weight = 128;
> module_param(napi_weight, int, 0444);
> @@ -126,6 +127,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>
> /* Per-cpu variable to show the mapping from CPU to virtqueue */
> int __percpu *vq_index;
> +
> + /* CPU hot plug notifier */
> + struct notifier_block nb;
> };
>
> struct skb_vnet_hdr {
> @@ -1016,7 +1020,7 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> +static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set, long hcpu)
> {
> int i;
> int cpu;
> @@ -1026,7 +1030,8 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> * setting the affinity hint to eliminate the contention.
> */
> if ((vi->curr_queue_pairs == 1 ||
> - vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus()) && set) {
> + vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus() - ((hcpu == -1) ? 0 : 1))
> + && set) {
> if (vi->affinity_hint_set)
> set = false;
> else
This make complex the this function. How about introduce another
function that just clean the affinity of cpu during CPU_DOWN_PREPARE.
Then we could get a simpler virtnet_set_affinity() called in CPU_DEAD
like you previous version?
> @@ -1036,6 +1041,8 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> if (set) {
> i = 0;
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu == hcpu)
> + continue;
> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
> *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
> @@ -1050,14 +1057,36 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> }
>
> i = 0;
> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu == hcpu)
> + continue;
> *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) =
> ++i % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> + }
>
> vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
> }
> }
>
> +static int virtnet_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = container_of(nfb, struct virtnet_info, nb);
> +
> + switch(action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
> + case CPU_ONLINE:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, -1);
> + break;
> + case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, (long)hcpu);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
> struct ethtool_ringparam *ring)
> {
> @@ -1105,7 +1134,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, queue_pairs);
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, -1);
> put_online_cpus();
> }
>
> @@ -1275,7 +1304,7 @@ static void virtnet_del_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> struct virtio_device *vdev = vi->vdev;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, false);
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, false, -1);
> put_online_cpus();
>
> vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> @@ -1400,7 +1429,7 @@ static int init_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> goto err_free;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, -1);
> put_online_cpus();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1534,6 +1563,13 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> }
> }
>
> + vi->nb.notifier_call = &virtnet_cpu_callback;
> + err = register_hotcpu_notifier(&vi->nb);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_debug("virtio_net: registering cpu notifier failed\n");
> + goto free_recv_bufs;
> + }
> +
> /* Assume link up if device can't report link status,
> otherwise get link status from config. */
> if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)) {
> @@ -1580,6 +1616,8 @@ static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
>
> + unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&vi->nb);
> +
> /* Prevent config work handler from accessing the device. */
> mutex_lock(&vi->config_lock);
> vi->config_enable = false;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] virtio-net: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:23:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F8EA61.4040900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358487121-7956-2-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 01/18/2013 01:32 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> Add a cpu notifier to virtio-net, so that we can reset the
> virtqueue affinity if the cpu hotplug happens. It improve
> the performance through enabling or disabling the virtqueue
> affinity after doing cpu hotplug.
>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>
> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> V4->V5:
> New method to deal with the cpu hotplug actions (Rusty)
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 440b0eb..061f2c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>
> static int napi_weight = 128;
> module_param(napi_weight, int, 0444);
> @@ -126,6 +127,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>
> /* Per-cpu variable to show the mapping from CPU to virtqueue */
> int __percpu *vq_index;
> +
> + /* CPU hot plug notifier */
> + struct notifier_block nb;
> };
>
> struct skb_vnet_hdr {
> @@ -1016,7 +1020,7 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> +static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set, long hcpu)
> {
> int i;
> int cpu;
> @@ -1026,7 +1030,8 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> * setting the affinity hint to eliminate the contention.
> */
> if ((vi->curr_queue_pairs == 1 ||
> - vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus()) && set) {
> + vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus() - ((hcpu == -1) ? 0 : 1))
> + && set) {
> if (vi->affinity_hint_set)
> set = false;
> else
This make complex the this function. How about introduce another
function that just clean the affinity of cpu during CPU_DOWN_PREPARE.
Then we could get a simpler virtnet_set_affinity() called in CPU_DEAD
like you previous version?
> @@ -1036,6 +1041,8 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> if (set) {
> i = 0;
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu == hcpu)
> + continue;
> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
> *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
> @@ -1050,14 +1057,36 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
> }
>
> i = 0;
> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu == hcpu)
> + continue;
> *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) =
> ++i % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> + }
>
> vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
> }
> }
>
> +static int virtnet_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = container_of(nfb, struct virtnet_info, nb);
> +
> + switch(action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
> + case CPU_ONLINE:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, -1);
> + break;
> + case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, (long)hcpu);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
> struct ethtool_ringparam *ring)
> {
> @@ -1105,7 +1134,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, queue_pairs);
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, -1);
> put_online_cpus();
> }
>
> @@ -1275,7 +1304,7 @@ static void virtnet_del_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> struct virtio_device *vdev = vi->vdev;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, false);
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, false, -1);
> put_online_cpus();
>
> vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> @@ -1400,7 +1429,7 @@ static int init_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> goto err_free;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true, -1);
> put_online_cpus();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1534,6 +1563,13 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> }
> }
>
> + vi->nb.notifier_call = &virtnet_cpu_callback;
> + err = register_hotcpu_notifier(&vi->nb);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_debug("virtio_net: registering cpu notifier failed\n");
> + goto free_recv_bufs;
> + }
> +
> /* Assume link up if device can't report link status,
> otherwise get link status from config. */
> if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)) {
> @@ -1580,6 +1616,8 @@ static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
>
> + unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&vi->nb);
> +
> /* Prevent config work handler from accessing the device. */
> mutex_lock(&vi->config_lock);
> vi->config_enable = false;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 5:32 [PATCH V5 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Wanlong Gao
2013-01-18 5:32 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-18 5:32 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] virtio-net: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug Wanlong Gao
2013-01-18 5:32 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-18 6:23 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-01-18 6:23 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-18 6:18 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Jason Wang
2013-01-18 6:18 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-18 6:25 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-18 6:25 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-18 6:40 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-18 6:40 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F8EA61.4040900@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=erdnetdev@gmail.com \
--cc=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.