From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: josef@toxicopanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>,
ameryhung@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:20:57 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50cb57cb36c935f24e3a5ec2d301c148@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930075154.189958-3-cui.tao@linux.dev>
Hello, Tao.
The following is a Claude-generated review.
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:51:52 +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> Add an example cost model implementing the full builtin linear HDD
> formula at double cost, and a test which attaches it to one device:
> the dev member of the struct_ops is written through the map's
> initial value before load, as hid_bpf tests do with hid_id, and
> loading the struct_ops attaches the model to the device. The test
> verifies the ctrl=bpf readback while attached, that a second model
> on the same device fails with -EBUSY, and that detaching restores
> the builtin model.
...
> cgroup that comes back starts fresh. opf carries the full bio->bi_opf
> including REQ_* flag bits, so the operation must be extracted with a
> mask, not compared for equality.
The description is out of date. The test reads back model=bpf and checks
that ctrl=bpf is rejected, calc_cost() takes the bio so there is no opf
argument, attaching rather than loading binds the model, and the
multi-stream model and its test aren't mentioned at all.
> + if (fwrite(buf, 1, strlen(buf), fp) != strlen(buf))
> + err = ferror(fp) ? errno : EIO;
> + if (fclose(fp) && !err)
> + err = errno;
> + return err;
...
> + err = write_cost_model(dev, "ctrl=bpf");
> + ASSERT_ERR(err, "ctrl_bpf_rejected");
write_cost_model() returns a positive errno while ASSERT_ERR() wants a
negative value, so this and model_bpf_after_detach fail with "unexpected
success: 22" on a correct kernel. Return -errno. Can you double check
that the posted runner passes against the posted kernel?
> + /* dev is the first member of struct iocost_model_ops */
> + ops_dev = bpf_map__initial_value(skel->maps.iocost_2x, NULL);
The skeleton exposes the struct_ops shadow type, so
skel->struct_ops.iocost_2x->dev = ... is type checked and drops the
layout assumption. Same for iocost_ms.
> +SEC(".struct_ops")
> +struct iocost_model_ops iocost_2x = {
With a plain struct_ops map, a test that dies between attach and detach
leaves the model attached until something deletes the map element. The
hid and sched_ext selftests use ".struct_ops.link" so that closing the fd
detaches. Can you use that here too?
> + cur = *cursor;
> + if (cur && priced) {
> + seek_pages = sector > cur ? sector - cur
> + : cur - sector;
A dataless flush is REQ_OP_WRITE|REQ_PREFLUSH at sector 0 with bi_size 0,
so priced is set here. Once a cgroup's cursor is past 16MB, every fsync
is judged a random write and charged 2 * (WRANDIO + WPAGE), about 5ms,
not the one-page write the header comment describes, and iocost_ms.c
prices the same bio with the sequential base. Can you gate the seek
judgement on a non-zero size?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 7:51 [RFC PATCH v8 0/4] blk-iocost: add BPF struct_ops cost model support Tao Cui
2026-09-30 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] " Tao Cui
2026-09-30 8:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 11:50 ` Tao Cui
2026-10-01 0:20 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-02 14:17 ` Tao Cui
2026-09-30 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test Tao Cui
2026-09-30 8:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 0:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-10-02 14:20 ` Tao Cui
2026-09-30 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] blk-iocost: add iocost_ioc_tick tracepoint for per-period device summary Tao Cui
2026-10-01 0:20 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-02 14:22 ` Tao Cui
2026-09-30 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH v8 4/4] docs: cgroup-v2: document the iocost BPF cost model attachment Tao Cui
2026-09-30 8:45 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 0:20 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-02 14:23 ` Tao Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50cb57cb36c935f24e3a5ec2d301c148@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@toxicopanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.