All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Input: gpio_keys: Fix suspend/resume press event lost
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:13:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5106A39A.5010402@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130122162434.5bcf3e14@notabene.brown>

On 01/22/2013 07:24 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:57:18 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:15:14PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> Rebased on linux_omap/master.
>>>
>>> During suspend/resume the key press can be lost if time of resume
>>> sequence is significant.
>>>
>>> If press event cannot be remembered then the driver can read the
>>> current button state only in time of interrupt handling. But in some
>>> cases when time between IRQ and IRQ handler is significant we can
>>> read incorrect state. As a particular case, when device is in suspend
>>> we press wakupable key and up it back in a jiffy, the interrupt
>>> handler read the state of up but the interrupt source is press indeed.
>>> As a result, in a OS like android, we resume then suspend right away
>>> because the key state is not changed.
>>>
>>> This patch add to gpio_keys framework opportunity to recover lost of
>>> press key event at resuming. The variable "key_pressed" from
>>> gpio_button_data structure is not used for gpio keys, it is only used
>>> for gpio irq keys, so it is logically used to remember press lost
>>> while resuming.
>> The same could happen if you delay processing of interrupt long enough
>> during normal operation. If key is released by the time you get around
>> to reading it you will not see a key press.
>>
>> To me this sounds like you need to speed up your resume process so that
>> you can start serving interrupts quicker.
>>
> Agreed.  When I was looking at this I found that any genuine button press
> would have at least 70msec between press and release, while the device could
> wake up to the point of being able to handle interrupts in about 14msec.
> That is enough of a gap to make it pointless to try to 'fix' the code.
>
> With enough verbose debugging enabled that 14msec can easily grow to
> hundreds, but then if  you have debugging enabled to can discipline yourself
> to hold the button for longer.
>
> Ivan: What sort of delay are you seeing between the button press and the
> interrupt routine running?  And can you measure how long the button is
> typically down for?
>
> NeilBrown

In my case I have the delay between the button press and the ISR
about 145ms. If the button down for 120ms the IRQ press event is
lost and if 160ms event is captured. I cannot speed up resume
process enough to guarantee correct work, so I wrote this fix.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Input: gpio_keys: Fix suspend/resume press event lost
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:13:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5106A39A.5010402@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130122162434.5bcf3e14@notabene.brown>

On 01/22/2013 07:24 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:57:18 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:15:14PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> Rebased on linux_omap/master.
>>>
>>> During suspend/resume the key press can be lost if time of resume
>>> sequence is significant.
>>>
>>> If press event cannot be remembered then the driver can read the
>>> current button state only in time of interrupt handling. But in some
>>> cases when time between IRQ and IRQ handler is significant we can
>>> read incorrect state. As a particular case, when device is in suspend
>>> we press wakupable key and up it back in a jiffy, the interrupt
>>> handler read the state of up but the interrupt source is press indeed.
>>> As a result, in a OS like android, we resume then suspend right away
>>> because the key state is not changed.
>>>
>>> This patch add to gpio_keys framework opportunity to recover lost of
>>> press key event at resuming. The variable "key_pressed" from
>>> gpio_button_data structure is not used for gpio keys, it is only used
>>> for gpio irq keys, so it is logically used to remember press lost
>>> while resuming.
>> The same could happen if you delay processing of interrupt long enough
>> during normal operation. If key is released by the time you get around
>> to reading it you will not see a key press.
>>
>> To me this sounds like you need to speed up your resume process so that
>> you can start serving interrupts quicker.
>>
> Agreed.  When I was looking at this I found that any genuine button press
> would have at least 70msec between press and release, while the device could
> wake up to the point of being able to handle interrupts in about 14msec.
> That is enough of a gap to make it pointless to try to 'fix' the code.
>
> With enough verbose debugging enabled that 14msec can easily grow to
> hundreds, but then if  you have debugging enabled to can discipline yourself
> to hold the button for longer.
>
> Ivan: What sort of delay are you seeing between the button press and the
> interrupt routine running?  And can you measure how long the button is
> typically down for?
>
> NeilBrown

In my case I have the delay between the button press and the ISR
about 145ms. If the button down for 120ms the IRQ press event is
lost and if 160ms event is captured. I cannot speed up resume
process enough to guarantee correct work, so I wrote this fix.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-28 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-21 13:15 [RFC PATCH] Input: gpio_keys: Fix suspend/resume press event lost Ivan Khoronzhuk
2013-01-21 13:15 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2013-01-21 23:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-01-22  5:24   ` NeilBrown
2013-01-28 16:13     ` ivan.khoronzhuk [this message]
2013-01-28 16:13       ` ivan.khoronzhuk
2013-01-28 18:51       ` NeilBrown
2013-01-28 18:51         ` NeilBrown
2013-01-31 13:25         ` ivan.khoronzhuk
2013-01-31 13:25           ` ivan.khoronzhuk
2013-02-04 22:40           ` NeilBrown
2013-02-04 22:40             ` NeilBrown
2013-02-06 16:57             ` ivan.khoronzhuk
2013-02-06 16:57               ` ivan.khoronzhuk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-18 12:51 Ivan Khoronzhuk
2013-01-18 12:51 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5106A39A.5010402@ti.com \
    --to=ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com \
    --cc=bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=wfp5p@virginia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.