From: Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com>
To: Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Persistent failures with simple md setup
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:07:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5108E2CC.4010806@profitbricks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565063.1kpR7lz4Ph@xrated>
On 29.01.2013 23:14, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
[...]
> ~# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid0] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md3 : active raid1 sda4[0]
> 869702736 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [U_]
> bitmap: 57/415 pages [228KB], 1024KB chunk
>
> md0 : active raid1 sda1[0]
> 96376 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [U_]
> bitmap: 1/6 pages [4KB], 8KB chunk
>
> md1 : active (auto-read-only) raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
> 2096468 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU]
> bitmap: 0/8 pages [0KB], 128KB chunk
>
> md124 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0]
> 104856180 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU]
> bitmap: 8/200 pages [32KB], 256KB chunk
>
> This looks like some kind of race during device detection.
> The full boot sequence log leading to this mess is attached.
[...]
> Could some kind soul tell me, what's going on here?
Funny, we've observed similar strange behavior when putting MD devices
on iSCSI/SRP exports. We connect to the SCSI target and udev does lots
of crap assembling only 1/2 or even 0/2 devices. This is why we disable
all udev rules related to MD and do it by custom scripts.
In mdadm 3.2.6 a possible fix has been introduced.
Check: git log mdadm-3.2.5..mdadm-3.2.6
commit 090900c3d2eb5b3aef5251a21228483c32246cc7
Author: Harald Hoyer <harald@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Aug 13 08:00:21 2012 +1000
udev-rules: prevent systemd from mount devices before they are ready.
commit b7e05d2373313dd8d0cb687479ad58a88f37d29f
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Thu May 24 11:49:49 2012 +1000
udev-rules: prevent systemd from mount devices before they are ready.
Does mdadm 3.2.6 solve this?
Cheers,
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-30 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 22:14 Persistent failures with simple md setup Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-01-30 9:07 ` Sebastian Riemer [this message]
2013-01-30 17:12 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-02-04 20:43 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-02-05 3:44 ` NeilBrown
2013-02-27 17:01 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-02-28 3:40 ` NeilBrown
2013-02-28 10:49 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-02-28 21:25 ` NeilBrown
2013-02-28 22:16 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
[not found] ` <4291349.FrQcKOnicQ@xrated>
2013-03-03 23:33 ` NeilBrown
2013-03-13 0:52 ` NeilBrown
2013-03-15 22:43 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-03-18 11:20 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-03-21 3:24 ` NeilBrown
2013-04-10 13:28 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-04-10 13:44 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-04-11 7:33 ` NeilBrown
2013-01-30 9:20 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5108E2CC.4010806@profitbricks.com \
--to=sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com \
--cc=hpj@urpla.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.