All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl/abx500: destroy mutex if returning early due to error
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:10:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51097E35.6080100@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359574822-15729-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>

On 01/30/2013 12:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> Current failure path neglects to mutex_destroy() before returning
> an error due to an invalid parameter or an error received from
> gpiochip_add(). This patch aims to remedy that behaviour.

> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c

> @@ -1155,11 +1155,13 @@ static int abx500_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	default:
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported pinctrl sub driver (%d)\n",
>  				(int) platid->driver_data);
> +		mutex_destroy(&pct->lock);
>  		return -EINVAL;

Especially given there's already a label out_free which performs this
mutex_destroy(), those last two lines would be better as:

ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;

>  	}
>  
>  	if (!pct->soc) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid SOC data\n");
> +		mutex_destroy(&pct->lock);
>  		return -EINVAL;

Same there.

>  	}
>  
> @@ -1176,6 +1178,7 @@ static int abx500_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = gpiochip_add(&pct->chip);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to add gpiochip: %d\n", ret);
> +		mutex_destroy(&pct->lock);
>  		goto out_rem_irq;

And here, just change the goto target to out_free rather than adding the
mutex_destroy() call.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
	Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@linaro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl/abx500: destroy mutex if returning early due to error
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:10:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51097E35.6080100@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359574822-15729-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>

On 01/30/2013 12:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> Current failure path neglects to mutex_destroy() before returning
> an error due to an invalid parameter or an error received from
> gpiochip_add(). This patch aims to remedy that behaviour.

> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c

> @@ -1155,11 +1155,13 @@ static int abx500_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	default:
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported pinctrl sub driver (%d)\n",
>  				(int) platid->driver_data);
> +		mutex_destroy(&pct->lock);
>  		return -EINVAL;

Especially given there's already a label out_free which performs this
mutex_destroy(), those last two lines would be better as:

ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;

>  	}
>  
>  	if (!pct->soc) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid SOC data\n");
> +		mutex_destroy(&pct->lock);
>  		return -EINVAL;

Same there.

>  	}
>  
> @@ -1176,6 +1178,7 @@ static int abx500_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = gpiochip_add(&pct->chip);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to add gpiochip: %d\n", ret);
> +		mutex_destroy(&pct->lock);
>  		goto out_rem_irq;

And here, just change the goto target to out_free rather than adding the
mutex_destroy() call.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-30 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-30 19:40 [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl/abx500: destroy mutex if returning early due to error Linus Walleij
2013-01-30 19:40 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-30 20:10 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-01-30 20:10   ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-31  8:01   ` Lee Jones
2013-01-31  8:01     ` Lee Jones
2013-01-31 17:28     ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-31 17:28       ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-31 17:45       ` Lee Jones
2013-01-31 17:45         ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51097E35.6080100@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.